On 11/21/19 6:36 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:07:46AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:13:37PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
>>> And get rid of the mmap_sem calls, as part of that. Note
>>> that get_user_pages_fast() will, if necessary, fall
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:14:51 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> A patch in net-next triggered a compile error on powerpc:
>
> include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h: In function 'u64_stats_read':
> include/asm-generic/local64.h:30:37: warning: passing argument 1 of
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:41:42 -0600, Thomas Falcon wrote:
> This patch series fixes some shortcomings with the current
> VNIC device command implementation. The first patch fixes
> the initialization of driver completion structures used
> for device commands. Additionally, all waits for device
>
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:41:46 -0600, Thomas Falcon wrote:
> @@ -5050,6 +5090,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_probe(struct vio_dev *dev, const
> struct vio_device_id *id)
> __ibmvnic_delayed_reset);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(>rwi_list);
> spin_lock_init(>rwi_lock);
> +
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:41:45 -0600, Thomas Falcon wrote:
> +static int ibmvnic_wait_for_completion(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter,
> +struct completion *comp_done,
> +unsigned long timeout)
> +{
> + struct net_device
The issue has showed the value of status of Speculation_Store_Bypass in the
/proc//status as `unknown` for PowerPC systems.
The patch fix the checking of the mitigation status of Speculation, and
can be reported as "not vulnerable", "globally mitigated" or "vulnerable".
Link:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:26:44AM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Using a mask to represent bus DMA constraints has a set of limitations.
> The biggest one being it can only hold a power of two (minus one). The
> DMA mapping code is already aware of this and treats dev->bus_dma_mask
> as a
On 21 November 2019 at 07:02 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 05:34:48PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
I modified the patch and compiled a new RC8 of kernel 5.4 today. (patch
attached)
We have to wait to Rolands test results with his SCSI PCI card. I tested it
today but
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205201
--- Comment #16 from Christian Zigotzky (chzigot...@xenosoft.de) ---
Created attachment 286031
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=286031=edit
dmesg of Christoph's Git kernel
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I think we have two sorta
Hi Sourabh,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.4-rc8 next-20191122]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option
10 matches
Mail list logo
