Re: Issues with the first PowerPC updates for the kernel 6.1

2022-10-15 Thread Christian Zigotzky
Hi All, make oldconfig has asked because of the CPU family. I choosed GENERIC for my P.A. Semi PWRficient PA6T-1682M. Is this correct? Maybe this is the problem. config GENERIC_CPU - bool "Generic (POWER4 and above)" + bool "Generic (POWER5 and PowerPC 970 and above)"

Re: Issues with the first PowerPC updates for the kernel 6.1

2022-10-15 Thread Christian Zigotzky
> On 15. Oct 2022, at 11:51, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-10-13 at 11:42 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote: >> Hi Christophe, >> >> Thanks a lot for your answer. OK, now, I know, that I don’t need to >> test it. After the boot of the latest git kernel, my system was >> extremely

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix /proc/cpuinfo cpumask warning

2022-10-15 Thread Yury Norov
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 05:58:43PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > Commit 78e5a3399421 ("cpumask: fix checking valid cpu range") has > started issuing warnings[*] when cpu indices equal to nr_cpu_ids - 1 > are passed to cpumask_next* functions. seq_read_iter() and cpuinfo's > start and next seq

Re: Issues with the first PowerPC updates for the kernel 6.1

2022-10-15 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On Thu, 2022-10-13 at 11:42 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > Thanks a lot for your answer. OK, now, I know, that I don’t need to > test it. After the boot of the latest git kernel, my system was > extremely damaged. Some config files has a size of several gigabytes > for