Re: [PATCH 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

Guenter Roeck writes: > On 3/14/24 07:37, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 3/14/24 06:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> Hi Günter, >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 6:03 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: Some unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by passing bad parameters to kernel API

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] powerpc/code-patching: Test patch_instructions() during boot

Benjamin Gray writes: > On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 08:38 +1100, Benjamin Gray wrote: >> On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 07:14 +, Christophe Leroy wrote: >> > Le 15/03/2024 à 03:57, Benjamin Gray a écrit : >> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/test-code-patching.c >> > >

[powerpc:next] BUILD SUCCESS 5c4233cc0920cc90787aafe950b90f6c57a35b88

haps_hs_smp_defconfig gcc arc nsimosci_hs_smp_defconfig gcc arc randconfig-001-20240317 gcc arc randconfig-002-20240317 gcc arm allmodconfig gcc arm allnoconfig clang arm

[powerpc:merge] BUILD SUCCESS 1a843dadfaed8a6b758d27c3e755b9a62aef8b13

allnoconfig gcc arc allyesconfig gcc arc defconfig gcc arc randconfig-001-20240317 gcc arc randconfig-002-20240317 gcc arm

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] powerpc/code-patching: Test patch_instructions() during boot

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] powerpc/code-patching: Test patch_instructions() during boot

On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 08:38 +1100, Benjamin Gray wrote: > On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 07:14 +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > > > Le 15/03/2024 à 03:57, Benjamin Gray a écrit : > > > patch_instructions() introduces new behaviour with a couple of > > > variations. Test each case of > > > > > >   

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] powerpc/code-patching: Optimise patch_memcpy() to 4 byte chunks

On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 06:39 +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 15/03/2024 à 03:57, Benjamin Gray a écrit : > > As we are patching instructions, we can assume the length is a > > multiple > > of 4 and the destination address is aligned. > > > > Atomicity of patching a prefixed instruction

Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] powerpc/code-patching: Use dedicated memory routines for patching

On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 06:36 +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 15/03/2024 à 03:57, Benjamin Gray a écrit : > > The patching page set up as a writable alias may be in quadrant 1 > > (userspace) if the temporary mm path is used. This causes sanitiser > > failures if so. Sanitiser failures

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] powerpc/code-patching: Test patch_instructions() during boot

On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 07:14 +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 15/03/2024 à 03:57, Benjamin Gray a écrit : > > patch_instructions() introduces new behaviour with a couple of > > variations. Test each case of > > > >    * a repeated 32-bit instruction, > >    * a repeated 64-bit instruction

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] powerpc/code-patching: Convert to open_patch_window()/close_patch_window()

On Sat, 2024-03-16 at 10:10 +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 15/03/2024 à 09:38, Christophe Leroy a écrit : > > > > > > Le 15/03/2024 à 03:59, Benjamin Gray a écrit : > > > The existing patching alias page setup and teardown sections can > > > be > > > simplified to make use of the new