e odd patch), whereas
I do get emails out of the blue for some of my other (much smaller)
stuff which clearly has users. I'd be just as happy for this to be
orphaned or for nothing to happen to it.
Honestly, I am totally ambivalent as to what happens to this code.
Martin, however, clearly cares enough to have asked me to supply a patch
to remove it.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@boo.tc
On 15/06/2020 00:28, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2020, Chris Boot wrote:
>
>> I expect that if someone finds this useful it can stick around (but
>> that's not my call).
>
> Who's call is that? If the patch had said "From: Martin K. Petersen"
On 14/06/2020 01:03, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2020, Chris Boot wrote:
>
>> I no longer have the time to maintain this subsystem nor the hardware to
>> test patches with.
>
> Then why not patch MAINTAINERS, and orphan it, as per usual practice?
>
> $