like integrating drivers later, I'll ask Linus
opinion on this one.
Linus ? What do you reckon ? Maybe a better option is just to remove
ps3nvram from .29 and merge the new one in .30 ?
It's an isolated driver for a special purpose platform, I would have
zero problems merging it :-)
--
Jens
mapping
for the bio, since I gather that isn't an issue on that platform. You
may want to detail that in a comment above the page_addres() thing at
the top of the loop, though.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https
On Thu, Mar 05 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Jens,
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Below is the rewrite of the PS3 Video RAM Storage Driver as a plain block
device, as requested by Arnd Bergmann.
The MTD-based PS3
On Thu, Mar 05 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Below is the rewrite of the PS3 Video RAM Storage Driver
On Fri, Mar 06 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
But then I noticed ps3vram_make_request() may be called concurrently,
so I had to add a mutex to avoid data corruption. This slows the
driver down
to consider that for a future
patch.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Mon, Mar 09 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05 2009
On Mon, Mar 09 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009
On Mon, Mar 09 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009
, but forgot to update akpm/next branches.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
patches, thanks Geert.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
.SyS_read+0x58/0xa0
[c000d6cf7e30] c00084ac syscall_exit+0x0/0x40
Just ran into this myself, too. I'll pull that bad patch from -next
asap. I wont be able to fix this before next week.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev
On Thu, Apr 09 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09 2009, Sachin Sant wrote:
I had Next 09 booted on a powerpc box and was compiling a kernel.
That's when i ran into this oops.
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x0010.
Faulting instruction address
files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Jens, can this go in through the powerpc tree?
Certainly
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Tue, Feb 19 2008, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:29:13 +0100
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's odd stuff. Could you perhaps try and add some printks to
block/cfq-iosched.c:call_for_each_cic(), like dumping the 'nr' return
from radix_tree_gang_lookup
On Tue, Feb 19 2008, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:58:38 +0100
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when I inserted printk here
==
for (i = 0; i nr; i++)
func(ioc, cics[i]);
printk(%d %lx\n, nr, index);
==
index was always 1 and nr was always
On Tue, Feb 19 2008, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:36:34 +0100
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19 2008, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:29:13 +0100
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's odd stuff. Could you perhaps try
On Tue, Feb 19 2008, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:36:34 +0100
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19 2008, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:29:13 +0100
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's odd stuff. Could you perhaps try
On Thu, Feb 21 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:36:34 +0100 Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I think the radix 'scan over entire tree' is a bit fragile.
eek, it had better not be. Was this an error in the caller? Hope so.
The cfq use of it, not the radix tree
#1 has been acked by the platform person.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
include/asm-parisc/cacheflush.h
include/linux/highmem.h
Not many drivers fiddle around with stuff like this, it's usually hidden
behind the dma api or in helpers.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org
be page cache pages.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Ah, that explains it. flush_dcache_page() is used
, not
to declare things that we've tried to make sure specifically aren't
declared.
I agree, I'll pass your fix on.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
is now all that
is needed. I will apply this to my barrier branch, where this originates
from.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Tue, Oct 02 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 13:59 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30 2007, Grant Likely wrote:
On 9/30/07, Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 04:57:09PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
+ if ((rc
On Wed, Oct 03 2007, Grant Likely wrote:
Jens,
Here are some more Sysace patches based on comments received on the
first series and a run through sparse. Can you please queue them up
for 2.6.24?
Applied all 3, looked fine to me.
--
Jens Axboe
are triggered by me running hdparm.
Was this intentional?
Nope, not intential to me at least. I'll check up on it.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
/scsi/scsi_lib.c
commit a3bec5c5aea0da263111c4d8f8eabc1f8560d7bf
Author: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Oct 17 19:33:05 2007 +0200
Revert [SCSI] Remove full sg table memset()
git log block/ll_rw_blk.c
commit ba951841ceb7fa5b06ad48caa5270cc2ae17941e
Author: Jens Axboe [EMAIL
scatterlist' has
no member named 'page'
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 07:05:12AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22 2007, Olof Johansson wrote:
More fallout from sg_page changes, found with powerpc allyesconfig:
drivers
: In function 'fetch_to_dev_buffer':
drivers/scsi/ps3rom.c:150: error: 'struct scatterlist' has no member named
'page'
Applied.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Tue, Oct 23 2007, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dale Farnsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/asm-powerpc/dma-mapping.h | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Should already be merged in Linus' current tree.
--
Jens Axboe
that didn't already get fixed?
As is, the patch won't apply for me, since it touches many different parts
and some of them are fixed.
Looks like just the mmc and xtensa bits, I've merged those up.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev
something
that should be fixed, did you try 2.6.24-rc1?
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Oct 24 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 11:14 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
I lost track - which kernel are you booting? This looks like something
that should be fixed, did you try 2.6.24-rc1?
No, it came out after I pulled, I was on v2.6.23-6815-g0895e91. I'll
give
, added for swift inclusion.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
+-
drivers/char/viotape.c |2 +-
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Jens, I assume that this is trivial enough that it can be sent via the
powerpc tree.
Of course :-)
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
'smp_call_function'
I applied the patch below.
Thanks Stephen, I've verified that the patch is correct!
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
the inputs.
Thanks
Divya
Hi All,
From the git bisect,seems like the commit
57439f878afafefad8836ebf5c49da2a0a746105 is the corrupt for the above
issue.
CC'ing Nick and Al.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
);
- bvec_kunmap_irq(bvec, flags);
+ bvec_kunmap_irq(buf, flags);
i++;
}
}
Thanks applied, that bug is all too common.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https
On Wed, Nov 19 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Jens,
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:16:28 +0100 Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange, so it gets stuck on the timer lock, very weird. You don't
happen to have output showing that the other CPU is up to at that point?
Unfortunately
This was on a Power5 partition. I am attempting to reproduce the problem.
Any clues?
Strange, so it gets stuck on the timer lock, very weird. You don't
happen to have output showing that the other CPU is up to at that point?
--
Jens Axboe
On Thu, Nov 20 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Jens,
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:34:09 +0100 Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you removing devices or modules? We have a bug there it seems, does
this help?
This is early in boot (we are waiting for the root device while running
old
--
1.5.5.GIT
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
system and you want to use
virtual disks created and managed by OS/400, say Y.
--
1.6.0.5
Indeed, looks good. I trust the ppc folks will carry this one? If so,
feel free to add my acked-by to this.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
On Wed, Jan 14 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
---
drivers/block/ps3disk.c | 18 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Jens, if its OK by you, this could go in via the PowerPC tree.
Of course.
--
Jens
@@
/*
- * ps3vram - Use extra PS3 video ram as MTD block device.
+ * ps3vram - Use extra PS3 video ram as block device.
*
* Copyright 2009 Sony Corporation
*
Looks good.
Jens, could you please apply.
Acked-by: Geoff Levand ge...@infradead.org
Yup will do, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
On 2010-10-16 21:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 21:42, Jens Axboe jax...@fusionio.com wrote:
On 2010-10-11 21:13, Dan Carpenter wrote:
This should pass buf to bvec_kunmap_irq() instead of bv. The api is
like kmap_atomic() instead of kmap().
Signed-off-by: Dan
|= IDE_DFLAG_MEDIA_CHANGED;
in drivers/ide/ide-cd.c:cdrom_saw_media_change() and see if it boots.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
on the list being empty or not.
Leaving that one (and the next one) out for now until Jens Ack them.
You can add my acked-by, this one is trivial and a good addition.
Cheers,
Ben.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert.uytterhoe...@sonycom.com
Cc: Jens Axboe ax...@kernel.dk
it -1UL now.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
with a floppy drive (the machine ships
only with one), so nobody cares...
While at it, add a little fix to clear up stale interrupts when loading
the driver or plugging a floppy drive in a bay.
Applied for current for-linus branch.
--
Jens Axboe
On 03/08/2012 05:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
It would probably be easiest if all these patches were merged via the
powerpc tree to eliminate any dependencies between them. Their impact on
generic code is very small.
Go ahead, no point in doing otherwise.
--
Jens Axboe
of
unrelated changes for 3 patches. If you are targeting the next release
and don't depend on existing block changes, then your base should be
4.0. If you are dependent on changes in the block tree, the block tree
should be your base.
--
Jens Axboe
regarding it.
Please apply, thanks.
Applied to for-4.2/drivers, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
fore that, so I hit this twice today.
Update to the tree as-of yesterday (or today) and it should work.
25364a9e54fb8296 doesn't include the latest block fixes that were sent
in yesterday, that should fix it. You need commit a88d32af18b8 or newer.
--
Jens Axboe
lready, so how is the above
making it any different? In general, NOMERGE being set or not should not
make a difference. It's only a hint that we need not check further if we
should be merging on this request, since we already tried it once, found
we'd exceed various limits, then set NOMERGE
On 11/25/2015 12:10 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 11/25/2015 06:56 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/25/2015 02:04 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 11/20/2015 04:28 PM, Ewan Milne wrote:
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 15:55 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Can't we have a joint effort here?
I've been spending
ease test this to ensure this still fixes your problem?
>
> This patch fixes the failure,
>
> Tested-by: Chandan Rajendra <chan...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
I've updated the patch, thanks guys.
--
Jens Axboe
m
> description and reproducer.
>
> Fixes: 20ce44d545844
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> Chandan, can you please test this to ensure this still fixes your problem?
Please, that would be great. And if so, then let's fold the two.
--
Jens Axboe
to clean bdev aliases under a bh and use it")
> ce98321bf7d2 ("fs: Remove unmap_underlying_metadata")
>
> Backing these patches out fixes the issue.
Fix is going out today, I see Chandan already pointed you at it. For the
other reporter, it's not an LE vs BE thing, it's a fs blocksize < page
size problem.
--
Jens Axboe
ts to compute the
> number of blocks to be cleaned.
Thanks, added for 4.10.
--
Jens Axboe
> Jens, could you expedite a pull request to Linus? This is affecting
> ext4 on 1k block file systems on x86/x86_64, so this is not a ppc-only
> regression.
Yes, it'll go out this morning.
--
Jens Axboe
by put_disk(). Add that call where
> needed.
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Today's mainline (4.11.0-rc1) booted with warnings on Power7 LPAR.
>>>>
>>>> Issue is not reproducible all the time.
Is that still the case with -git as of yesterday? Check that you
have this merge:
34bbce9e344b47e8871273409632f525973afad4
in your tree.
--
Jens Axboe
On 07/28/2017 12:19 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> writes:
>> On 07/27/2017 08:47 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 08:02 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> The bug looks like SCSI running the queue inline from IRQ
The bug looks like SCSI running the queue inline from IRQ
context, that's not a good idea. Can you confirm the below works for
you?
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index f6097b89d5d3..78740ebf966c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -
On 07/27/2017 08:47 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 08:02 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> The bug looks like SCSI running the queue inline from IRQ
>> context, that's not a good idea. Can you confirm the below works for
>> you?
>>
>>
>> diff --
r
> than "unsigned long" i.e. 32 bits on 32 bit powerpc.
>
> This has been discussed before (and, I think, a fix attempted).
Gah, thanks for letting me know. I'll test your patch and queue it
up to fix this issue.
--
Jens Axboe
On 06/28/2017 08:01 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/28/2017 06:43 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 06/28/2017 02:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Jens,
>>>
>>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>> allnoconfig) failed like th
On 06/28/2017 06:43 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/28/2017 02:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allnoconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> fs/fcntl.o: In function `do_fcntl':
>&g
On 07/28/2017 09:13 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 08:25 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 07/28/2017 12:19 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> OK, so the resolution is "fix it in IPR" ?
>>
>> I'll leave that to the SCSI crew. But at least one b
On 08/01/2017 12:55 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> writes:
> ...
>>
>> Can you try the below fix? Should be more palatable than the previous
>> one. Brian, maybe you can take a look at the IRQ issue mentioned above?
>
> Given th
On 08/08/2017 04:16 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Geoff Levand <ge...@infradead.org> writes:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> A few very minor updates for PS3. Please apply.
>
> Jens do you want to take the block ones, or should I just take the lot?
Up to you, I'm fine either way.
--
Jens Axboe
On 05/05/2017 12:25 AM, Abdul Haleem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 4.11.0 Linus mainline booted with Warnings on PowerPC.
>
> We did not see this on next-20170407 but on next-20170410 and later.
Have you tried current Linus -git? Both of the -next versions you list
are rather old.
--
Jens Axboe
On 05/08/2017 01:13 AM, Abdul Haleem wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 08:02 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 05/05/2017 12:25 AM, Abdul Haleem wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 4.11.0 Linus mainline booted with Warnings on PowerPC.
>>>
>>> We did not se
a problematic workload - which
> may be triggered by a fuzzer.
If it's expected, why don't we kill the WARN_ON_ONCE()? I get it all
the time running xfstests as well.
--
Jens Axboe
On 09/18/2017 09:43 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 05:39:47PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:28:55AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> If it's expected, why don't we kill the WARN_ON_ONCE()? I get it all
>>> the time running x
On 5/9/18 7:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series converts a few random block drivers to be highmem safe,
> in preparation of eventually getting rid of the block layer bounce
> buffering support.
Series looks good to me.
--
Jens Axboe
On 5/9/18 7:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series converts a few random block drivers to be highmem safe,
> in preparation of eventually getting rid of the block layer bounce
> buffering support.
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
On 6/7/18 8:45 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/7/18 4:37 AM, vrbagal1 wrote:
>> On 2018-06-07 13:12, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 12:56 +0530, Venkat Rao B wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 07 June 2018 12:46 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>>>> On T
dm driver is involved. An
>> important fix
>> for the dm driver went upstream recently, namely d37753540568 ("dm: Use
>> kzalloc
>> for all structs with embedded biosets/mempools"). Can you double check
>> whether
>> that commit it present in your tree?
On 6/18/18 1:33 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Tejun Heo writes:
> ...
>> Jens Axboe (10):
>> libata: introduce notion of separate hardware tags
>> libata: convert core and drivers to ->hw_tag usage
>> libata: bump ->qc_active t
On 6/19/18 1:29 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Jens Axboe writes:
>> On 6/18/18 1:33 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> Tejun Heo writes:
>>> ...
>>>> Jens Axboe (10):
>>>> libata: introduce notion of separate hardware tags
>>&g
On 6/19/18 1:29 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Jens Axboe writes:
>> On 6/18/18 1:33 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> Tejun Heo writes:
>>> ...
>>>> Jens Axboe (10):
>>>> libata: introduce notion of separate hardware tags
>>&g
On 6/19/18 5:35 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Jens Axboe writes:
>> On 6/19/18 1:29 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> Jens Axboe writes:
>>>> On 6/18/18 1:33 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>>> Tejun Heo writes:
>>>>> ...
>>>&
w them out.
>
> A short status yields the following _outdated_ 00-INDEX files, first
> counter is files listed in 00-INDEX but missing in the directory, last
> is files present but not listed in 00-INDEX.
For the block related bits:
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe
--
Jens Axboe
mempool_free_slab, (void *) kc);
}
diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c
index b54f2c20e5e0..060f44acd0df 100644
--- a/mm/mempool.c
+++ b/mm/mempool.c
@@ -508,7 +508,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mempool_alloc_slab);
void mempool_free_slab(void *element, void *pool_data)
{
struct kmem_cache *mem = pool_data;
- kmem_cache_free(mem, element);
+
+ if (!WARN_ON(!mem))
+ kmem_cache_free(mem, element);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mempool_free_slab);
--
Jens Axboe
sn't boot any more, bisect points at one of:
>>>
>>> cef6f55a9fb4 Mike Snitzer dm table: require that request-based DM
>>> be layered on blk-mq devices
>>> 953923c09fe8 Mike Snitzer dm: rename DM_TYPE_MQ_REQUEST_BASED to
>>> DM_TYPE_REQU
request_irq() error path. Move the memset() to fix this bug.
>
> BTW, the request_irq() failure for the left mediabay floppy (fd1) is not
> a regression. I don't know why it happens. The right media bay floppy
> (fd0) works fine however.
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
ethod.
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
On 12/30/18 10:44 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Signed-off-by: Finn Thain
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
-off-by: Anshuman Khandual
>
> For the 'ixgbe' driver changes.
>
> Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher
Lost the original, but for mtip32xx:
Acked-by: Jens Axboe
--
Jens Axboe
On 4/3/19 9:49 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 09:39:52AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 4/3/19 9:19 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 07:49:26AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 4/3/19 5:11 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>
On 4/3/19 9:19 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 07:49:26AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 4/3/19 5:11 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> will@autoplooker:~/liburing/test$ ./io_uring_register
>>> RELIMIT_MEMLOCK: 67108864 (67108864)
>>&
odules linked in:
> [ 35.485311] CPU: 113 PID: 3973 Comm: io_uring_regist Not tainted
> 5.1.0-rc3-00012-g40b114779944 #1
> [ 35.486712] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> [ 35.487450] pstate: 2045 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO)
> [ 35.488228] pc : link_pwq+0x10/0x60
> [ 35.488794] lr : apply_wqattrs_commit+0xe0/0x118
> [ 35.489550] sp : 17e2bbc0
Huh, this looks odd, it's crashing inside the wq setup.
--
Jens Axboe
s/block/ps3vram.c: In function ‘ps3vram_probe’:
> drivers/block/ps3vram.c:770:23: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument
> of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘sector_t {aka long long
> unsigned int}’ [-Wformat=]
>
> Fix this by using "%llu" instead.
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
user_pages() to pin_user_pages().
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard
You dropped my reviewed-by now... Given the file, you'd probably want
to keep that.
--
Jens Axboe
On 11/29/19 8:14 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 29/11/2019 à 17:04, Jens Axboe a écrit :
On 11/29/19 6:53 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
CC fs/io_uring.o
fs/io_uring.c: In function ‘loop_rw_iter’:
fs/io_uring.c:1628:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kmap’
[-Werror=implicit
On 11/29/19 10:07 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
On 29/11/2019 20:16, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/29/19 8:14 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Reverting commit 311ae9e159d8 ("io_uring: fix dead-hung for non-iter
fixed rw") clears the failure.
Most likely an #include is missing.
Huh weird how
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
