[PATCH 1/1] powerpc/jump_label: use HAVE_JUMP_LABEL?

2014-08-20 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL doesn't ensure HAVE_JUMP_LABEL, if it is not the case use maintainers's own mutex to guard the modification of global values. Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou yizhouz...@ict.ac.cn --- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-tracepoints.c |2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c

[PATCH 1/1] powerpc/iommu: Handling null return of kzalloc_node

2014-06-10 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
NULL return of kzalloc_node should be handled Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou yizhouz...@ict.ac.cn --- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 22 -- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms

[PATCH 1/1] kernel code that do not handle NULL return of kmem_cache_zalloc

2013-11-27 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
I do a grep for kmem_cache_zalloc and kmem_cache_alloc in kernel tree, and find some code do not handle NULL return of kmem_cache_zalloc correctly Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou yizhouz...@ict.ac.cn --- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_32_mmu_host.c |5 + drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c|3

ping: re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel code that do not handle NULL return of kmem_cache_zalloc

2013-12-01 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
ping  I do a grep for kmem_cache_zalloc and kmem_cache_alloc  in kernel tree, and find some code do not handle NULL  return of kmem_cache_zalloc correctly      Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou yizhouz...@ict.ac.cn  ---   arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_32_mmu_host.c |5 +   drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c

Re: rcutorture’s init segfaults in ppc64le VM

2022-03-09 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Dear Paul I try to reproduce the bug in ppc64 VM in Oregon State University using the vmlinux extracted from https://owww.molgen.mpg.de/~pmenzel/rcutorture-2022.02.01-21.52.37-torture-locktorture-kasan-lock01.tar.xz the ppc64 VM in which I run the qemu without hardware acceleration is: Linux

Re: rcutorture’s init segfaults in ppc64le VM

2022-03-10 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Dear Paul On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 4:10 PM Paul Menzel wrote: > > Dear Zhouyi, > > > Thank you for still looking into this. You are very welcome ;-) > > > Am 10.03.22 um 03:37 schrieb Zhouyi Zhou: > > > I try to reproduce the bug in ppc64 VM in Oregon State

Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/sched/mm.h:256

2022-02-12 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Dear Paul I think the key to the problem lies in your attached console.log (pasted below), at times 0.014987 and 0.015995, I see there are two locks (cpu_hotplug_lock and jump_label_mutex) holded while kmem_cache_alloc calls __might_resched (0.023356). I guess PowerPC's map_patch_area should

Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/sched/mm.h:256

2022-02-12 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Thank Matthew for correcting me On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 12:09 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 11:19:09AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > I think the key to the problem lies in your attached console.log > > (pasted below), at times 0.014987 and 0.015995, I

Re: rcutorture’s init segfaults in ppc64le VM

2022-02-07 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Hi, The mailing list forward the emails to me in periodic style, very sorry not seeing Willy's email until I visited https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20220207180901.gb14...@1wt.eu/T/#u, I am also very interested in testing Willy's proposal. Thanks a lot Zhouyi On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:46 PM Zhouyi

Re: rcutorture’s init segfaults in ppc64le VM

2022-02-07 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Dear Paul I am also very interested in the topic. The Open source lab of Oregon State University has lent me a 8 core power ppc64el VM for 3 months, I guess I can try reproducing this bug in the Virtual Machine by executing qemu in non hardware accelerated mode (using -no-kvm argument). I am

Re: BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on write at 0x00000000 (rtmsg_ifinfo_build_skb)

2022-02-08 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Menzel and all other community members who support my tiny research. Thanks Zhouyi On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 10:39 AM Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > Thank Paul for your encouragement! > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 1:50 AM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 09:08:40AM +08

Re: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU

2022-04-06 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Hi I can reproduce it in a ppc virtual cloud server provided by Oregon State University. Following is what I do: 1) curl -l https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/snapshot/linux-5.18-rc1.tar.gz -o linux-5.18-rc1.tar.gz 2) tar zxf linux-5.18-rc1.tar.gz 3) cp config

Re: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU

2022-04-07 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Dear Paul and Miguel On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 1:55 AM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 07:05:58PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 5:15 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > Ah. So you would instead look for boot to have completed within 10 > > > seconds?

Re: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU

2022-04-06 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Hi Paul On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 1:00 AM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 05:31:10PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > Hi > > > > I can reproduce it in a ppc virtual cloud server provided by Oregon > > State University. Following is what I

Re: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU

2022-04-08 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael Ellerman wrote: > > "Paul E. McKenney" writes: > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 05:31:10PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> I can reproduce it in a ppc virtual cloud server provided by Oregon >

Re: [PATCH RFC] rcu: torture: shorten the time between forward-progress tests

2023-08-23 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 5:15 AM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 11:06:02PM +0800, zhouzho...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Zhouyi Zhou > > > > Currently, default time between rcu torture forward-progress tests is 60HZ, > > Under this config

Re: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU

2022-04-06 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Hi Paul On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:50 AM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 02:25:59AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > Hi Paul > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 1:00 AM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 05:31

Re: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU

2022-04-08 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 10:07 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 06:02:19PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > > > "Paul E. McKenney" writes: > > > > On Wed,

Re: [PATCH linux-next] powerpc: init jump label early in ppc 64

2022-07-25 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 3:55 PM Michael Ellerman wrote: > > zhouzho...@gmail.com writes: > > From: Zhouyi Zhou > > > > In ppc 64, invoke jump_label_init in setup_feature_keys is too late > > because static key will be used in subroutine of early_init_dev

Re: [PATCH linux-next] powerpc: use raw_smp_processor_id in arch_touch_nmi_watchdog

2022-07-14 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Thank John for correcting me ;-) On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 5:25 PM John Ogness wrote: > > On 2022-07-14, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > use raw_smp_processor_id() in arch_touch_nmi_watchdog > > because when called from watchdog, the cpu is preemptible. > > I would expect the cor

[PATCH linux-next] powerpc: use raw_smp_processor_id in arch_touch_nmi_watchdog

2022-07-13 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
use raw_smp_processor_id() in arch_touch_nmi_watchdog because when called from watchdog, the cpu is preemptible. Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou --- Dear PPC developers I found this bug when trying to do rcutorture tests in ppc VM of Open Source Lab of Oregon State University. qemu-system-ppc64

Re: [PATCH linux-next] powerpc: disable sanitizer in irq_soft_mask_set

2022-08-23 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:50 AM Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > Le 23/08/2022 à 10:47, Christophe Leroy a écrit : > > > > > > Le 23/08/2022 à 10:33, Michael Ellerman a écrit : > >> Zhouyi Zhou writes: > >> > >> My worry is that this

Re: [PATCH linux-next] powerpc: disable sanitizer in irq_soft_mask_set

2022-08-22 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 2:04 PM Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > Le 21/08/2022 à 03:00, Zhouyi Zhou a écrit : > > In ppc, compiler based sanitizer will generate instrument instructions > > around statement WRITE_ONCE(local_paca->irq_soft_mask, mask): > > > &

[PATCH linux-next] powerpc: disable sanitizer in irq_soft_mask_set

2022-08-20 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
;stb r9,2354(r31)", r31 may not equal to r13, in such case, irq soft mask will not work. This patch disable sanitizer in irq_soft_mask_set. Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou --- Dear PPC developers I found this bug when trying to do rcutorture tests in ppc VM of Open Source Lab of Oreg

[PATCH linux-next][RFC] powerpc: avoid lockdep when we are offline

2022-09-26 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
will call __lock_acquire when CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y. The latter function will travel RCU protected list, so "WARNING: suspicious RCU usage" will be triggered. Avoid lockdep when we are offline. Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou --- Dear PPC and RCU developers I found this bug when trying to do rcutor

Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC] powerpc: avoid lockdep when we are offline

2022-09-28 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:51 AM Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > On Wed Sep 28, 2022 at 11:48 AM AEST, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > Thank Nick for reviewing my patch > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 12:25 PM Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > > > > > On Tue Sep 27

[PATCH linux-next][RFC] powerpc: protect cpu offlining by RCU offline lock

2022-09-13 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
From: Zhouyi Zhou During the cpu offlining, the sub functions of xive_teardown_cpu will call __lock_acquire when CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y. The latter function will travel RCU protected list, so "WARNING: suspicious RCU usage" will be triggered. Try to protect cpu offlining by RCU offline loc

[PATCH linux-next][RFC] powerpc: protect cpu offlining by RCU offline lock

2022-09-13 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
o my subject line. Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou --- [it seems that there are some delivery problem in my previous email, so I send again via gmail, sorry for the trouble] Dear PPC and RCU developers I found this bug when trying to do rcutorture tests in ppc VM of Open Source Lab of Oregon State U

Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC] powerpc: protect cpu offlining by RCU offline lock

2022-09-14 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 8:17 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:15:28AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > During the cpu offlining, the sub functions of xive_teardown_cpu will > > call __lock_acquire when CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y. The latter function will > > t

Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC] powerpc: fix HOTPLUG error in rcutorture

2022-10-10 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Thanks Michael for reviewing my patch On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:21 PM Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Zhouyi Zhou writes: > > I think we should avoid torture offline the cpu who do tick timer > > when nohz full is running. > > Can you tell us what the bug you're fixing is?

[PATCH linux-next][RFC] powerpc: fix HOTPLUG error in rcutorture

2022-10-09 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Failures: 11 I examined the console.log and Make.out files one by one, no new compile error or test error is introduced by above fix. Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou --- Dear PPC developers I found this bug when trying to do rcutorture tests in ppc VM of Open Source Lab of Oregon State University

Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC] powerpc: avoid lockdep when we are offline

2022-10-09 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:49 AM Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > On Thu Sep 29, 2022 at 11:48 AM AEST, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:51 AM Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > > > > > On Wed Sep 28, 2022 at 11:48 AM AEST, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > &

Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC] powerpc: avoid lockdep when we are offline

2022-09-27 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Thank Nick for reviewing my patch On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 12:25 PM Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > On Tue Sep 27, 2022 at 11:48 AM AEST, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > This is second version of my fix to PPC's "WARNING: suspicious RCU usage", > > I improved my fix under Paul E. M

Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC]torture: avoid offline tick_do_timer_cpu

2022-11-23 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 6:37 AM Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:51:40AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > During CPU-hotplug torture (CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y), if we try to > > offline tick_do_timer_cpu, the operation will fail because in > > fun

Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC]torture: avoid offline tick_do_timer_cpu

2022-11-23 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 2:49 AM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 10:23:11AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 9:37 AM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:51:40AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: >

[PATCH linux-next][RFC]torture: avoid offline tick_do_timer_cpu

2022-11-20 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
erformed in PPC VM of Open Source Lab of Oregon State University, and reproducable in RISC-V and X86-64 (with additional kernel commandline cpu0_hotplug). In this patch, we avoid offline tick_do_timer_cpu by distribute the offlining cpu among remaining cpus. Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou --- inclu

Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC]torture: avoid offline tick_do_timer_cpu

2022-11-27 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Thank you all for your guidance and encouragement! I learn how to construct commit message properly and learn how important the role that the torture test framework plays for the Linux kernel. Hope I can be of benefit to the community by my work. I am going to continue to study this topic and

Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC]torture: avoid offline tick_do_timer_cpu

2022-11-22 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 9:37 AM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:51:40AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > During CPU-hotplug torture (CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y), if we try to > > offline tick_do_timer_cpu, the operation will fail because in > > fun

Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC]torture: avoid offline tick_do_timer_cpu

2022-11-26 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Thank Thomas for your guidance On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 1:05 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21 2022 at 11:51, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > During CPU-hotplug torture (CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y), if we try to > > offline tick_do_timer_cpu, the operation will fail becau

[PATCH linux-next][RFC]powerpc: move pseries interrupt cleanup code to under __cpu_disable

2022-11-08 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
in ppc VM of Open Source Lab of Oregon State University, by comparing the test results, our fix don't introduce new bugs and fixed previous "WARNING: suspicious RCU usage" bugs. Suggested-by: Nicholas Piggin Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou --- Dear PPC and RCU developers I tries do move pseri

Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC] powerpc: fix HOTPLUG error in rcutorture

2022-11-12 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Hi, I also reappear the same phenomenon in RISC-V: [ 120.156380] scftorture: --- End of test: LOCK_HOTPLUG So I guess it is not the arch's responsibility. I am very interested in it ;-) Thank you both for your guidance! Cheers Zhouyi On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 9:59 AM Zhouyi Zhou wrote

BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-22 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Dear PowerPC and RCU developers: During the RCU torture test on mainline (on the VM of Opensource Lab of Oregon State University), SRCU-P failed with __stack_chk_fail: [ 264.381952][ T99] [c6c7bab0] [c10c67c0] dump_stack_lvl+0x94/0xd8 (unreliable) [ 264.383786][ T99]

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-22 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 3:19 AM Joel Fernandes wrote: > > Hi Zhouyi, Thank Joel for your quick response ;-) I will gradually provide all the necessary information to facilitate our chasing. Please do not hesitate email me if I have ignored any ;-) > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 2:47 PM

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-24 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:07 AM Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Zhouyi Zhou writes: > > Dear PowerPC and RCU developers: > > During the RCU torture test on mainline (on the VM of Opensource Lab > > of Oregon State University), SRCU-P failed with __stack_chk_fail: >

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-25 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
hi On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:07 AM Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Zhouyi Zhou writes: > > Dear PowerPC and RCU developers: > > During the RCU torture test on mainline (on the VM of Opensource Lab > > of Oregon State University), SRCU-P failed with __stack_chk_fail: >

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-26 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:09 AM Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Zhouyi Zhou writes: > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:01 PM Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:07 AM Michael Ellerman > >> wrote: > ... > >> > > >> > There's 12.2

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-27 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:09 AM Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Zhouyi Zhou writes: > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:01 PM Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:07 AM Michael Ellerman > >> wrote: > ... > >> > > >> > There's 12.2

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-27 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:13 PM Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Zhouyi Zhou writes: > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:09 AM Michael Ellerman > > wrote: > >> > >> Zhouyi Zhou writes: > >> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:01 PM Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > >

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-25 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
hi On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:13 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 02:55:11PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > This is amazing debugging Boqun, like a boss! One comment below: > > > > > > > Or something simple I haven't thought of? :) > > > > > > > > At what points can r13

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-25 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 7:06 PM Joel Fernandes wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:58 AM Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > > > hi > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:13 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 02:55:11PM -0400, Joel Fe

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-25 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Hi On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 9:40 PM Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > Le 25/04/2023 à 13:06, Joel Fernandes a écrit : > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:58 AM Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > >> > >> hi > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:13 PM Peter Zijlstra

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-25 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 8:33 AM Joel Fernandes wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 9:50 AM Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 9:40 PM Christophe Leroy > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 25/04/

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-25 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 10:15 AM Joel Fernandes wrote: > > Hi Zhouyi, > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 09:31:17AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > [..] > > Joel makes the learning process easier for me, indeed! > > I know that feeling being a learner myself ;-) > > >

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-25 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:01 PM Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > hi > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:07 AM Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > Zhouyi Zhou writes: > > > Dear PowerPC and RCU developers: > > > During the RCU torture test on mainline (on the VM of Opens

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-22 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 9:37 AM Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 3:19 AM Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > > Hi Zhouyi, > Thank Joel for your quick response ;-) > I will gradually provide all the necessary information to facilitate > our chasing. Please do n

Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail

2023-04-23 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
Thank Boqun for your wonderful analysis! On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:33 AM Boqun Feng wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 09:28:39PM +0200, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 2:47 PM Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > > > > > Dear PowerPC and RCU developers: >

Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC]torture: avoid offline tick_do_timer_cpu

2023-07-06 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 3:09 PM Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > Le 21/11/2022 à 04:51, Zhouyi Zhou a écrit : > > During CPU-hotplug torture (CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y), if we try to > > offline tick_do_timer_cpu, the operation will fail because in > &g