Sorry for the late reply,
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:35:11 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 17:19 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:05:23 -0700
Nishanth Aravamudan n...@us.ibm.com wrote:
From: Milton Miller milt
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:05:23 -0700
Nishanth Aravamudan n...@us.ibm.com wrote:
From: Milton Miller milt...@bga.com
If an architecture sets ARCH_HAS_DMA_GET_REQUIRED_MASK and has settable
dma_map_ops, the required mask may change by the ops implementation.
For example, a system that always
task management response (for now, 'NOT SUPPORTED').
- remove dead code.
=
From: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] tcm ibmvscsis driver
This replaces ibmvstgt driver that uses the old target framework.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
').
- remove dead code.
=
From: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] tcm ibmvscsis driver
This replaces ibmvstgt driver that uses the old target framework.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/Makefile|4 +-
drivers
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 10:44:53 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 10:33 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
Also allow the coherent ops to be iommu if only the coherent mask is too
small, mostly for driver that do not set set the coherent mask but
On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:20:54 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 21:31 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
+config ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
+ def_bool ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
+
I seemed to have missed what this is about entirely. Is there some
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index 631e5a0..b0e58f5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:16:34 +0200
Roedel, Joerg joerg.roe...@amd.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 07:55:03AM -0400, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
I guess that this driver does a partial sync with
dma_sync_single_for_* API. dma-debug can't handle it properly. It's
likely that this is a false
CC'ed to dma-debug maintainer.
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:21:09 +0530
Subrata Modak subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
On boot, Badness at lib/dma-debug.c:902, Call Trace Instruction Dump
are recorded at /var/log/messages:
(the
383af9525bb27f927511874f6306247ec13f1c28). But somehow I messed the
'protect4gb' boot parameter that was used to enable the
workaround.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c | 12
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:05:21 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 15:50 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
Thanks, here's the patch in the proper format.
=
From: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: [PATCH] ibmvscsi: fix DMA
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:48:55 +0530
Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com wrote:
2.6.34-rc3 boot on a power5 box produces this badness message
during ibmvscsi initialization.
ibmvscsi 3003: Client reserve enabled
ibmvscsi 3003: sent SRP login
ibmvscsi 3003: SRP_LOGIN succeeded
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:07:58 +0530
Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:48:55 +0530
Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com wrote:
2.6.34-rc3 boot on a power5 box produces this badness message
during ibmvscsi initialization.
ibmvscsi
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:58:41 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:40 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
The current SWIOTLB code uses a default of 64MB for the IO TLB area.
This size can be influenced
(as x86 does).
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Tested-by: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c |6 --
arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c |6 --
arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c |6 ++
3 files changed, 6 insertions
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:28:09 -0500
Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:08 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:58:41 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:40 +0100
Albert
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:40 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
The current SWIOTLB code uses a default of 64MB for the IO TLB area.
This size can be influenced using a kernel command line parameter swiotlb.
Unfortunately, the parsing of the kernel command line is done _after_
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:39 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
The current SWIOTLB code does not support NOT_COHERENT_CACHE platforms.
This patch adds support for NOT_COHERENT_CACHE platforms to SWIOTLB by
adding two platform specific functions swiotlb_dma_sync_page() and
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:54:40 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:39 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
The current SWIOTLB code does not support NOT_COHERENT_CACHE platforms.
This patch adds support for NOT_COHERENT_CACHE
Seems that IOMMU_VMERGE option description gives the false
information:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparcm=126753808727669w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparcm=126753880528825w=2
IOMMU_VMERGE is unnecessary nowadays so how about removing it?
=
From: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:13:52 +1100
Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 08:54 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
Seems that IOMMU_VMERGE option description gives the false
information:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparcm=126753808727669w=2
http://marc.info/?l
:271: error: unused variable 'prop'
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c:270: error: unused variable 'parent'
make[3]: *** [arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.o] Error 1
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c |4 +++-
1 files
We can kill unused swiotlb variable.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c
index e96cbbd
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:10:17 +0900
Akinobu Mita akinobu.m...@gmail.com wrote:
My user space testing exposed off-by-one error find_next_zero_area
in iommu-helper. Some zero area cannot be found by this bug.
Subject: [PATCH] Fix off-by-one error in find_next_zero_area
Signed-off-by: Akinobu
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:43:56 +0900
Akinobu Mita akinobu.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/17 FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:10:17 +0900
Akinobu Mita akinobu.m...@gmail.com wrote:
My user space testing exposed off-by-one error find_next_zero_area
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:48:42 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:08 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
The above swiotlb patchset was merged in -tip so I think that merging
this patchset via -tip too is the easiest way to handle this patchset
, at a certain moment I needed your
patch (I booted, got a problem, patched the tree with your patch,
rebooted, it worked).
Then, git says:
f078727b250c2653fc9a564f15547c17ebac3f99 is first bad commit
commit f078727b250c2653fc9a564f15547c17ebac3f99
Author: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon
Now swiotlb_pci_dma_ops is identical to swiotlb_dma_ops; we can use
swiotlb_dma_ops with any devices. This removes swiotlb_pci_dma_ops.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Acked-by: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/swiotlb.h
This is the second version of the patchset to convert POWERPC to use
asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=124840628128189w=2
There are some minor changes since the first version are:
- removed unused CONFIG_PPC_NEED_DMA_SYNC_OPS [5/7] (Becky pointed
out).
-
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Acked-by: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig |6 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 242 +---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 241 deletions
POWERPC needs this hook. SPARC could use it too.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Acked-by: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
---
include/linux/dma-mapping.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b
This converts uses dma_map_ops struct (in include/linux/dma-mapping.h)
instead of POWERPC homegrown dma_mapping_ops.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Acked-by: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/device.h |4 +-
arch/powerpc
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h |5 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c |3 ++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
b/arch/powerpc/include
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig |1 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 11 ++-
arch/powerpc/kernel/dma.c | 11 +++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
information:
http://marc.info/?t=12471906021r=1w=2
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Acked-by: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/device.h |3 ++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h |8 +++---
arch/powerpc/include
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:08:46 -0500
Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:24 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Fujita,
Since you're removing all the uses of it, you should probably remove
POWERPC needs this hook. SPARC could use it too.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
include/linux/dma-mapping.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
index c0f6c3c..91b7618
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig |2 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 242 +---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 237 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc
This patchset converts POWERPC to use asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h.
The major change is removing addr_needs_map in struct dma_mapping_ops
(1/5):
http://marc.info/?t=12471906021r=1w=2
This is on the top of my swiotlb cleanup patchset:
This converts uses dma_map_ops struct (in include/linux/dma-mapping.h)
instead of POWERPC homegrown dma_mapping_ops.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/device.h |4 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 84
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:20:22 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:12:48 +0200
Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote:
functionality and reimplemented the surrounding infrastructure in
terms of that (and incorporating our additional requirements). I
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:40:29 +0100
Ian Campbell ian.campb...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 05:20 +0100, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:02:00 +0100
Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:35 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
I
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:12:48 +0200
Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote:
functionality and reimplemented the surrounding infrastructure in
terms of that (and incorporating our additional requirements). I
prototyped this (it is currently unworking, in fact it seems to
have developed rather a
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:02:00 +0100
Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:35 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
I don't think that we need to take account of dom0 support; we don't
have a clear idea about an acceptable dom0 design (it needs to use
swiotlb code? I
phys_to_dma() and dma_to_phys() are used instead of
swiotlb_phys_to_bus() and swiotlb_bus_to_phys().
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c | 10 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel
is_buffer_dma_capable() was replaced with dma_capable().
is_buffer_dma_capable() tells if a buffer is dma-capable or
not. However, it doesn't take a pointer to struct device so it doesn't
work for POWERPC.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
include/linux/dma
phys_to_dma() and dma_to_phys() are used instead of
swiotlb_phys_to_bus() and swiotlb_bus_to_phys().
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c | 11 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc
dma_capable() eventually replaces is_buffer_dma_capable(), which tells
if a memory area is dma-capable or not. The problem of
is_buffer_dma_capable() is that it doesn't take a pointer to struct
device so it doesn't work for POWERPC.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
- removes unused (and unnecessary) hooks in swiotlb.
- adds dma_capable() and converts swiotlb to use it. It can be used to
know if a memory area is dma capable or not. I added
is_buffer_dma_capable() for the same purpose long ago but it turned
out that the function doesn't work on POWERPC.
This
dma_capable() eventually replaces is_buffer_dma_capable(), which tells
if a memory area is dma-capable or not. The problem of
is_buffer_dma_capable() is that it doesn't take a pointer to struct
device so it doesn't work for POWERPC.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
dma_capable() eventually replaces is_buffer_dma_capable(), which tells
if a memory area is dma-capable or not. The problem of
is_buffer_dma_capable() is that it doesn't take a pointer to struct
device so it doesn't work for POWERPC.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c |2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/pci-gart_64.c |5 ++---
arch/x86/kernel/pci-nommu.c |2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c b/arch/x86/kernel
Nobody uses swiotlb_alloc().
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c |5 -
include/linux/swiotlb.h |2 --
lib/swiotlb.c |8 ++--
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch
Nobody uses swiotlb_alloc_boot().
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c |5 -
include/linux/swiotlb.h |2 --
lib/swiotlb.c |7 +--
3 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git
provide.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c | 27 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c
index 41534ae..a3bbe02
This adds two functions, phys_to_dma() and dma_to_phys() to x86, IA64
and powerpc. swiotlb uses them. phys_to_dma() converts a physical
address to a dma address. dma_to_phys() does the opposite.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
This converts swiotlb to use dma_capable() instead of
swiotlb_arch_address_needs_mapping() and is_buffer_dma_capable().
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
lib/swiotlb.c | 24 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git
Nobody uses swiotlb_arch_range_needs_mapping().
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c |5 -
include/linux/swiotlb.h |2 --
lib/swiotlb.c | 15 ++-
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 20
This converts swiotlb to use phys_to_dma and dma_to_phys instead of
swiotlb_phys_to_bus() and swiotlb_bus_to_phys().
swiotlb_phys_to_bus() and swiotlb_bus_to_phys() are not necessary so
this patch also removes them.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
include/linux
swiotlb_bus_to_virt is unncessary; we can use swiotlb_bus_to_phys and
phys_to_virt instead.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c | 10 --
lib/swiotlb.c | 34 --
2 files
I'm trying to convert POWERPC to use asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h.
POWERPC needs addr_needs_map() in struct dma_mapping_ops for SWIOTLB
support but I want to avoid add addr_needs_map() in struct
dma_map_ops. IIRC, you guys think it as a temporary solution and
talked about defining something
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:12:36 +0200
Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote:
* FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
- removes unused (and unnecessary) hooks in swiotlb.
- adds dma_capable() and converts swiotlb to use it. It can be used to
know if a memory area is dma capable
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:45 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:02 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 16 June 2009, Scott Wood wrote:
If the
device is the only one, you can also use dma_alloc_noncoherent() and
flush explicitly
On Thu, 21 May 2009 20:01:37 +0100
Ian Campbell ian.campb...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
It's not actually clear to me that we need that check, though. Can
someone explain what case that was designed to catch?
If map_single fails and returns NULL then we try to use
io_tlb_overflow_buffer, if
On Thu, 21 May 2009 13:18:54 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge jer...@goop.org wrote:
Becky Bruce wrote:
I can work with that, but it's going to be a bit inefficient, as I
actually need the dma_addr_t, not the phys_addr_t, so I'll have to
convert. In every case, this is a conversion I've
CC'ed linux-kernel
On Thu, 14 May 2009 17:42:28 -0500
Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
This patch includes the basic infrastructure to use swiotlb
bounce buffering on 32-bit powerpc. It is not yet enabled on
any platforms. Probably the most interesting bit is the
addition of
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:06:16 -0500
Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Apr 20, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Becky Bruce wrote:
Currently, the 32-bit code uses sg-length instead of sg-dma_lentgh
to report sg_dma_len. However, since the default dma code for 32-bit
(the dma_direct case)
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:03:20 -0500
Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Apr 20, 2009, at 11:57 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 20, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Becky Bruce wrote:
This patch includes the basic infrastructure to use swiotlb
bounce buffering on 32-bit powerpc. It is
This is a resend of:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=122482703616607w=2
=
From: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: remove dead BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY definition
The block layer dropped the virtual merge feature
(b8b3e16cfe6435d961f6aaebcfd52a1ff2a988c5
The block layer dropped the virtual merge feature
(b8b3e16cfe6435d961f6aaebcfd52a1ff2a988c5). BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY
definition is meaningless now (For POWER, BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY has been
meaningless for a long time since POWER disables the virtual merge
feature).
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Joerg Roedel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:03:28 +0200
That may be the reason that your fix is not yet upstream.
The reason is more-so because Linus simply hasn't merged more
than a couple
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:43:23 +1000
Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This reverts commit 29111f579f4f3f2a07385f931854ab0527ae7ea5.
This undoes the hasty addition of a global version of iommu_num_pages()
that broke both the powerpc and sparc builds. This function can be
revisited
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:26:11 +0200
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 13:41
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:31:56 +0200
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, the machine crashes when removing the media-bay CD-ROM drive.
Crash appears to be a NULL deref, possibly in elv_may_queue() though
I don't have a clean backtrace yet, working on it...
I
/platforms/cell/spufs/file.o] Error 1
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c
index 80911a3
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:25:09 -0700
Geoff Levand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add an include asm/time.h statement for get_tb().
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ps3/ps3-lpm.c:192
management
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This adds IOMMU helper functions for the free area management. These
functions take care of LLD's segment boundary limit for IOMMUs. They would be
useful for IOMMUs that use bitmap for the free area management.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:05:39 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
[snip]
Thanks,
Can you try this?
diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c
index e7d8544..495575a 100644
--- a/lib/iommu-helper.c
+++ b/lib/iommu-helper.c
@@ -8,15
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:15:37 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:08:25 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:18:50 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:18:50 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've just seen this on my dmesg, this is new, never seen this before on
this box and it happens only with this version of the kernel.
In this configuration, the page size is set to 64K and I've enabled fake
NUMA
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:08:25 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:18:50 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I might break the IOMMU code. Can you reproduce it easily? If so,
reverting my IOMMU patches (I've
81 matches
Mail list logo
