| 27
> ++
> include/linux/sysfs.h | 15
> init/initramfs.c | 10 +---
> kernel/module/sysfs.c | 13 +--
> 10 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>
> --
For the series
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 4:52 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2023, at 15:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 3:12 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Arnd Bergmann
> >>
> >> The arch_resume_nosmt() has a __wea
/power/hibernate.c:189:5: error: no previous prototype for
> 'arch_resume_nosmt' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
>
> Add the prototype in linux/suspend.h, which is included in
> both places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
Do you want me to pick this up?
If not
Acked-by: Rafael J.
of.h) and drop including of_device.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> ---
> Please ack and I will take the series via the DT tree.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
> drivers/thermal/cpuidle_cooling.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff
of.h) and drop including of_device.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> ---
> Please ack and I will take the series via the DT tree.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 1 -
> drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> d
hotplug.h, of.h, and of_platform.h) and drop including of_device.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> ---
> Please ack and I will take the series via the DT tree.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 1 -
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qc
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 5:26 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 10-03-23, 08:47, Rob Herring wrote:
> > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> > of_property_read_ functions) rather than low-level
> > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
> > Convert
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 12:08 PM Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
>
> Add a way to let the drivers know if the processes are frozen.
>
> This is needed by drivers that are waiting for processes to end on their
> shutdown path.
>
> Convert pm_freezing into a function and export it, so it can be used by
>
l; have a look where you haven't already.
>
>
> New since v1:
>
> - rebase on top of Frederic's rcu-context-tracking rename fest
> - more omap goodness as per the last discusion (thanks Tony!)
> - removed one more RCU_NONIDLE() from arm64/risc-v perf code
> - ubsan/kasan fi
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:00 PM Wolfram Sang
wrote:
>
> Follow the advice of the below link and prefer 'strscpy' in this
> subsystem. Conversion is 1:1 because the return value is not used.
> Generated by a coccinelle script.
>
> Link:
>
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 11:48 AM Michel Lespinasse
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 04:59:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:25 PM Michel Lespinasse
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:20:53AM -0700, Paul E. Mc
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:25 PM Michel Lespinasse
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:20:53AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 12:43:06PM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 04:27:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > Commit c227233ad64c
y_ide_irq from
> headers where it is no longer used.
>
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
> Acked-by: Pierre Morel
> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann
> Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
>
> Since v3:
> - Further remove the definictions of pc
> .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: acpi_idle_enter+0xfe: call to num_online_cpus()
> leaves .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: acpi_idle_enter+0x115: call to
> acpi_idle_fallback_to_c1.isra.0() leaves .noinstr.text section
>
> Signed-off-
disabling into the idle function, meaning
> that those architectures can avoid the pointless IRQ state flipping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
> arch/alpha/kernel/process.c |1 -
> arch/arc/kernel/process.c|
t; explicit annotations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c |6 +-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
ieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>, Frederic Weisbecker , Len
Brown , linux-xte...@linux-xtensa.org, Sascha Hauer
, Vasily Gorbik , linux-arm-msm
, linux-al...@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k
, Stafford Horne , Linux ARM
, Chris Zankel ,
Stephen Boyd , dingu...@kernel.org, Daniel Bristot de
Oliveira ,
ieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>, Frederic Weisbecker , Len
Brown , linux-xte...@linux-xtensa.org, Sascha Hauer
, Vasily Gorbik , linux-arm-msm
, linux-al...@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k
, Stafford Horne , Linux ARM
, Chris Zankel ,
Stephen Boyd , dingu...@kernel.org, Daniel Bristot de
Oliveira ,
...@jurassic.park.msu.ru, Johannes Berg
, linuxppc-dev
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+archive=mail-archive@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:47 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> cpuidle_state::enter() methods should be IRQ invariant
>
> Signed-of
er Zijlstra (Intel)
> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 50
> +-
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
&g
nnes Berg
, linuxppc-dev
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+archive=mail-archive@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 5:48 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 05:01:05PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 8, 20
d intel_idle in two ways:
>
> - must not have tracing in idle functions
> - must return with IRQs disabled
>
> Additionally, it added a branch for no good reason.
>
> Fixes: c227233ad64c ("intel_idle: enable interrupts before C1 on Xeons")
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zi
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 6:57 PM Dmitry Osipenko
wrote:
>
> There are other methods of powering off machine than the reboot syscall.
> Previously we missed to coved those methods and it created power-off
> regression for some machines, like the PowerPC e500. Fix this problem
> by moving the legacy
t; > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 07:54:02PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On 3/25/2022 8:50 PM, Rajvi Jingar wrote:
> > > > > > For the PCIe devices (like nvme) that do not go into D3 state still
> > > > > > need to
> > > >
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 8:27 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 01-04-22, 19:24, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > powerpc's asm/prom.h brings some headers that it doesn't
> > need itself.
> >
> > In order to clean it up, first add missing headers in
> > users of asm/prom.h
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 6:09 PM Benjamin Stürz wrote:
>
> This replaces comments with C99's designated
> initializers because the kernel supports them now.
However, note that all of the ACPICA material should be submitted to
the upstream ACPICA project via https://github.com/acpica/acpica
Also
Borntraeger
> Cc: Sven Schnelle
> Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Steven Rostedt
> Cc: Ingo Molnar
> Cc: "David S. Miller"
> Cc: sparcli...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Michael Ellerman
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Cc: Paul Mackerras
> Cc
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 8:04 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> 10.12.2021 21:27, Rafael J. Wysocki пишет:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:34 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>
> >> 29.11.2021 03:26, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 7:54 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> 10.12.2021 21:32, Rafael J. Wysocki пишет:
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 7:02 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>
> >> Emit warning if unregister_restart_handler() fails since it never should
> >> fail.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 7:52 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> 10.12.2021 21:19, Rafael J. Wysocki пишет:
> ...
> >> +bool atomic_notifier_has_unique_priority(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh,
> >> + struct notifier_block *n)
> >> +{
> >> +
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 7:16 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> 10.12.2021 21:09, Rafael J. Wysocki пишет:
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 7:02 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>
> >> There is no need to annotate function prototypes with 'extern', it makes
> >>
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 7:02 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> Emit warning if unregister_restart_handler() fails since it never should
> fail. This will ease further API development by catching mistakes early.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko
> ---
> kernel/reboot.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:34 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> 29.11.2021 03:26, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:06:19AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> 28.11.2021 03:28, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 09:00:41PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Add
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 7:02 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> Correct s/implemenations/implementations/ in .
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko
This patch clearly need not be part of this series.
> ---
> include/linux/reboot.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 7:02 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> Add atomic/blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority() helpers which return
> true if given handler has unique priority.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko
> ---
> include/linux/notifier.h | 5 +++
> kernel/notifier.c| 69
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 7:01 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> Add blocking_notifier_call_chain_is_empty() that returns true if call
> chain is empty.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko
> ---
> include/linux/notifier.h | 2 ++
> kernel/notifier.c| 14 ++
> 2 files changed, 16
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 7:02 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> There is no need to annotate function prototypes with 'extern', it makes
> code less readable. Remove unnecessary annotations from .
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko
I'm not sure that this is really useful.
Personally, I tend to
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 11:18 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> SoC platforms often have multiple options of how to perform system's
> power-off and restart operations. Meanwhile today's kernel is limited to
> a single option. Add combined power-off+restart handler call chain API,
> which is inspired
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 11:18 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> SoC platforms often have multiple options of how to perform system's
> power-off and restart operations. Meanwhile today's kernel is limited to
> a single option. Add combined power-off+restart handler call chain API,
> which is inspired
Thus, let's pass NULL instead of current_cred() here faute de
> mieux.
>
> Improvements-suggested-by: Casey Schaufler
> Improvements-suggested-by: Paul Moore
> Fixes: 59438b46471a ("security,lockdown,selinux: implement SELinux lockdown")
> Acked-by: Dan Williams
ck)
> Reviewed-by: Tom Rix (For fpga)
> Acked-by: Geoff Levand (For ps3)
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
For the ACPI part:
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
>
> arch/arm/common/locomo.c | 3 +--
> arch/arm/common/sa.c | 4 +---
>
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 6:42 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> This flag is set by one of the drivers but it isn't used in the code
> otherwise. Remove the unused flag and update the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
Applied as 5.12 material, thanks!
> ---
> Rebased over:
>
>
ault,invalid}_noflush().
>
> Still, add a WARN_ON() so that future changes in set_memory APIs will not
> silently break hibernation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport
>From the hibernation support perspective:
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
&
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 1:32 PM Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 04:41:34PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Gautham R. Shenoy (5):
> > cpuidle-pseries: Set the latency-hint before entering CEDE
> >
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 2:43 PM Pratik Rajesh Sampat
wrote:
>
> Fire directed smp_call_function_single IPIs from a specified source
> CPU to the specified target CPU to reduce the noise we have to wade
> through in the trace log.
And what's the purpose of it?
> The module is based on the idea
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:14 PM Wei Yongjun wrote:
>
> The sparse tool complains as follows:
>
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c:25:23: warning:
> symbol 'pseries_idle_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> 'pseries_idle_driver' is not used outside of this file, so marks
> it
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:14 PM Wei Yongjun wrote:
>
> The sparse tool complains as follows:
>
> drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:88:1: warning:
> symbol 'pstate_revmap' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:383:18: warning:
> symbol
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:58 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have picked Quentin's series over my patch, modified both and tested.
>
> V3->V4:
> - Do __module_get() for cpufreq_default_governor() case as well and get
> rid of an extra variable.
> - Use a single character array,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:50 PM Quentin Perret wrote:
>
> On Thursday 25 Jun 2020 at 15:28:43 (+0200), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:53 PM Quentin Perret wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thursday 25 Jun 2020 at 13:44:34 (+0200), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:53 PM Quentin Perret wrote:
>
> On Thursday 25 Jun 2020 at 13:44:34 (+0200), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:36 PM Viresh Kumar
> > wrote:
> > > This change is not right IMO. This part handles the s
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> After your last email (reply to my patch), I noticed a change which
> isn't required. :)
>
> On 23-06-20, 15:21, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:50 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 24-06-20, 16:32, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > Right, but I must admit that, looking at this more, I'm getting a bit
> > confused with the overall locking for governors :/
> >
> > When in cpufreq_init_policy() we find a governor using
> >
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 7:50 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 23-06-20, 15:21, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > Currently, the only way to specify the default CPUfreq governor is via
> > Kconfig options, which suits users who can build the kernel themselves
> > perfectly.
> >
> > However, for those who use
On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:34:56 AM CET Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> > On Monday, March 16, 2020 2:57:43 PM CET Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
> >> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
> >> size
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Darren Hart
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko
> Cc: platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Cc: Zhang Rui
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Len Brown
> Cc: linux-a...
On Monday, March 16, 2020 2:57:43 PM CET Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
>
> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur
> on unthrottling")
>
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:35 AM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> Currently system reboots uses architecture specific codes (smp_send_stop)
> to offline non reboot CPUs. Most architecture's implementation is looping
> through all non reboot online CPUs and call ipi function to each of them. Some
>
timeval type in user space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
For the change in power/power.h
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h | 3 ++-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c| 4 ++--
> fs/select.c
On Monday, October 21, 2019 4:51:48 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> There is no need to cast a typed pointer to a void pointer when calling
> a function that accepts the latter. Remove it, as the cast prevents
> further compiler checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
> ---
>
On Monday, October 21, 2019 4:51:48 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> There is no need to cast a typed pointer to a void pointer when calling
> a function that accepts the latter. Remove it, as the cast prevents
> further compiler checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
Greg, have you
e throttling due to Pmax
> capping at chip level")
> Cc: Michael Ellerman
> Cc: Shilpasri G Bhat
> Cc: Preeti U Murthy
> Cc: Viresh Kumar
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard
&g
has a bug: it fails with a stack
> > overrun, if CONFIG_NR_CPUS > 256.
> >
> > Fix both problems by dynamically allocating based on CONFIG_NR_CPUS.
> >
> > Fixes: 053819e0bf840 ("cpufreq: powernv: Handle throttling due to Pmax
> > capping at chip level&qu
ding on. So add this API to help walk through all registered
> wakeup source objects on that list and return them one by one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ran Wang
> Tested-by: Leonard Crestez
OK, thanks for making all of the requested changes:
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
and please fee
ontinue;
> +
> + /* We can only OR related bits */
> + if (rcpm->little_endian) {
> + tmp |= ioread32(address);
> + iowrite32(tmp, address);
> + } else {
> + tmp |= ioread32be(address);
> + iowrite32be(tmp, address);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + wakeup_sources_read_unlock(idx);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops rcpm_pm_ops = {
> + .prepare = rcpm_pm_prepare,
> +};
For the above:
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:51 AM Ran Wang wrote:
>
> Some user might want to go through all registered wakeup sources
> and doing things accordingly. For example, SoC PM driver might need to
> do HW programming to prevent powering down specific IP which wakeup
> source depending on. So add this
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:52 AM Ran Wang wrote:
>
> The NXP's QorIQ Processors based on ARM Core have RCPM module
> (Run Control and Power Management), which performs system level
> tasks associated with power management such as wakeup source control.
>
> This driver depends on PM wakeup source
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 5:49 AM Ran Wang wrote:
>
> Some user might want to go through all registered wakeup sources
> and doing things accordingly. For example, SoC PM driver might need to
> do HW programming to prevent powering down specific IP which wakeup
> source depending on. So add this
On Monday, August 19, 2019 10:33:25 AM CEST Ran Wang wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Monday, August 19, 2019 16:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:15 AM Ran Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rafael,
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:15 AM Ran Wang wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Monday, August 05, 2019 17:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, July 24, 2019 9:47:20 AM CEST Ran Wang wrote:
> > > Some user might want to go through all registered wake
On Wednesday, July 24, 2019 9:47:20 AM CEST Ran Wang wrote:
> Some user might want to go through all registered wakeup sources
> and doing things accordingly. For example, SoC PM driver might need to
> do HW programming to prevent powering down specific IP which wakeup
> source depending on. So
On Tuesday, July 16, 2019 6:06:08 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> It always returns 0 (success) and its return type should really be void.
> Over that, many drivers have added error handling code based on its
> return value, which is not required at all.
>
> change its return type to void and
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:14 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 16-07-19, 12:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:49 AM Viresh Kumar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Now that cpufreq core supports taking QoS re
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:49 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Now that cpufreq core supports taking QoS requests for min/max cpu
> frequencies, lets migrate rest of the users to using them instead of the
> policy notifiers.
Technically, this still is linux-next only. :-)
> The
6b75f ("cpufreq/pasemi: fix possible object reference leak")
> > Signed-off-by: Wen Yang
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar
> > Cc: Michael Ellerman
> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> >
On Friday, May 24, 2019 12:44:18 PM CEST Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> The declaration for pfn_is_nosave is only available in
> kernel/power/power.h. Since this function can be override in arch,
> expose it globally. Having a prototype will make sure to avoid warning
> (sometime treated as error with
On Monday, May 20, 2019 11:52:36 AM CEST Ran Wang wrote:
> Some user might want to go through all registered wakeup sources
> and doing things accordingly. For example, SoC PM driver might need to
> do HW programming to prevent powering down specific IP which wakeup
> source depending on. And is
t", they use "Where".
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/pstore | 2 +-
> .../sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-format | 2 +-
>
On Tuesday, May 28, 2019 3:16:30 AM CEST Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> > On Friday, May 24, 2019 12:44:18 PM CEST Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >> The declaration for pfn_is_nosave is only available in
> >> kernel/power/power.h. Since
On Friday, May 24, 2019 12:44:18 PM CEST Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> The declaration for pfn_is_nosave is only available in
> kernel/power/power.h. Since this function can be override in arch,
> expose it globally. Having a prototype will make sure to avoid warning
> (sometime treated as error with
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 4:48 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
>
> Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation
> links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
For the ACPI part:
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, April 25, 2019 5:20:35 PM CEST Changbin Du wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:44:14AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > .On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 7:54 PM Changbin Du wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > > The kernel now uses Sphinx t
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:50 AM Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> Dear Rafael,
>
>
> On 04/29/2019 09:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:54 PM Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> >> Updating an IBM S822LC from Ubuntu 18.10 to 19.04 some user space stu
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:54 PM Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> Dear Linux folks,
>
>
> Updating an IBM S822LC from Ubuntu 18.10 to 19.04 some user space stuff
> seems to have changed, so that going into sleep/suspend is enabled.
>
> That raises two questions.
>
> 1. Is suspend actually supported on a
.On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 7:54 PM Changbin Du wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> The kernel now uses Sphinx to generate intelligent and beautiful documentation
> from reStructuredText files. I converted all of the Linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs to
> reST format in this serias.
>
> The hieararchy of ACPI docs are based
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 6:30 PM Changbin Du wrote:
>
> Hi Corbet and All,
> The kernel now uses Sphinx to generate intelligent and beautiful documentation
> from reStructuredText files. I converted all of the Linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs to
> reST format in this serias.
>
> In this version I combined
On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:52:34 PM CEST Mohan Kumar wrote:
> Use pr_debug instead of printk
>
> WARNING: Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_dbg([subsystem]dev, ... then
> dev_dbg(dev, ... then pr_debug(... to printk(KERN_DEBUG ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohan Kumar
> ---
>
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 11:17 AM Abhishek Goel
wrote:
>
> Currently, the cpuidle governors (menu /ladder) determine what idle state
There are three governors in 5.1-rc.
> an idling CPU should enter into based on heuristics that depend on the
> idle history on that CPU. Given that no predictive
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:29 AM Abhishek wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for such a descriptive review. I will include all the suggestions
> made in my next iteration.
Please give me some time to send comments before that.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 8:31 AM Abhishek Goel
wrote:
>
> Currently, the cpuidle governors (menu /ladder) determine what idle state
> an idling CPU should enter into based on heuristics that depend on the
> idle history on that CPU. Given that no predictive heuristic is perfect,
> there are cases
On Wednesday, November 21, 2018 5:02:04 AM CET Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20-11-18, 11:05, Yangtao Li wrote:
> > The of_find_node_by_path() returns a node pointer with refcount
> > incremented,but there is the lack of use of the of_node_put() when
> > done.Add the missing of_node_put() to release
On Monday, November 26, 2018 7:02:26 AM CET Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 23-11-18, 08:33, Yangtao Li wrote:
> > of_find_node_by_path() acquires a reference to the node
> > returned by it and that reference needs to be dropped by its caller.
> > g5_neo2_cpufreq_init() doesn't do that, so fix it.
> >
>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:57 PM Yangtao Li wrote:
>
> use of_node_put() to release the refcount.
Again, this changelog is as good as no changelog at all.
If you are adding a missing of_node_put(), please say that and explain
why it is necessary.
Thanks,
Rafael
_hotplug_lock is never
> exported).
>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Cc: Paul Mackerras
> Cc: Michael Ellerman
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
> Cc: Len Brown
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky
> Cc: Juergen Gross
> Cc: Nathan Fontenot
>
t; Apart from that, there are not other users in the tree.
>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Cc: Paul Mackerras
> Cc: Michael Ellerman
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
> Cc: Len Brown
> Cc: Rashmica Gupta
> Cc: Michael Neuling
> Cc: Balbir Singh
> Cc: Nathan Fontenot
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:17 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:31 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:32 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > > -static struct pci_bus *pci_scan_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> > &g
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:20 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:33 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > @@ -909,8 +881,7 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct
> > > acpi_pci_roo
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:32 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> pcibios_scan_root() is now just a wrapper around pci_scan_root_bus(),
> and merging the two into one makes it shorter and more readable.
>
> We can also take advantage of pci_alloc_host_bridge() doing the
> allocation of the sysdata for
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:33 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> The acpi_pci_create_root_bus() can be fully integrated into
> acpi_pci_root_create(), improving a few things:
>
> * We can call pci_scan_root_bus_bridge(), which registers and
> scans the bridge in one step.
> * After a failure in
struct. The "private" pointer in struct hotplug_slot thereby becomes
> unused, so drop it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Cc: Len Brown
> Cc: Scott Murray
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Cc: Paul Mackerras
> Cc: Michael Ellerman
> once on probe. That seems unlikely to me, still maintainers should
> review the changes carefully for this possibility.
I'm not aware of any case in which it will break anything, so
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
but if that happens, it may be necessary to add the execution of the
control methods in question directly to the initialization part.
1 - 100 of 319 matches
Mail list logo
