and ftrace no
longer complains, and I can trace my module's functions.
So I can add
Tested-By: Roger Blofeld blofel...@yahoo.com
-rb
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Hi,
Shouldn't the corresponding ftrace code be updated to match? Perhaps like the
following (untested) patch:
Signed-off-by: Roger Blofeld blofel...@yahoo.com
---
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -245,9 +245,9 @@ __ftrace_make_nop
- Original Message
From: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
To: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
Sent: Mon, August 2, 2010 12:21:22 PM
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: Dont require a dma_ops struct to set dma mask
The only reason to require a dma_ops struct is to see if it has
implemented
To: roger blofeld blofel...@yahoo.com
Cc: ga...@kernel.crashing.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
sta...@kernel.org
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 11:49:27 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Restore dma ops for powermac cardbus drivers
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 20:23 -0800, roger blofeld wrote
Commit 4ae0ff606e848fa4957ebf8f97e5db5fdeec27be broke dma setup for cardbus
devices such as sata_sil, rt2500 and ath5k. This patch restores the default
dma ops for cardbus devices. Tested with sata_sil on a powerbook G4.
bz#537176
Signed-off-by: Roger Blofeld blofel...@yahoo.com
---
The inline
Hi
I have a powerbook G4 which has drives connected via a cardbus sata_sil. It is
running fedora 11. It boots fine with 2.6.27.35-170.2.94.fc10.ppc, but with
2.6.30.8-64.fc11.ppc because of an error in the probe function of sata_sil.
I have traced the problem to be the line in sata_sil.c
