Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 14:25:05 -0500 "Eric W. Biederman"
wrote:
> I am not strongly against taking off __weak, just wondering if there's
> chance to fix it in recordmcount, and the cost comparing with kernel fix;
> except of this issue, any other weakness of __weak.
On Fri, 20 May 2022 14:25:05 -0500 "Eric W. Biederman"
wrote:
> > I am not strongly against taking off __weak, just wondering if there's
> > chance to fix it in recordmcount, and the cost comparing with kernel fix;
> > except of this issue, any other weakness of __weak. Noticed Andrew has
> >
Baoquan He writes:
> On 05/19/22 at 12:59pm, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Baoquan He writes:
>>
>> > Hi Eric,
>> >
>> > On 05/18/22 at 04:59pm, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> "Naveen N. Rao" writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Since commit d1bcae833b32f1 ("ELF: Don't generate unused section
>> >> >
On 05/19/22 at 12:59pm, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Baoquan He writes:
>
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > On 05/18/22 at 04:59pm, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Naveen N. Rao" writes:
> >>
> >> > Since commit d1bcae833b32f1 ("ELF: Don't generate unused section
> >> > symbols") [1], binutils (v2.36+)
Baoquan He writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 05/18/22 at 04:59pm, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Naveen N. Rao" writes:
>>
>> > Since commit d1bcae833b32f1 ("ELF: Don't generate unused section
>> > symbols") [1], binutils (v2.36+) started dropping section symbols that
>> > it thought were unused. This
Baoquan He wrote:
Hi Eric,
On 05/18/22 at 04:59pm, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Naveen N. Rao" writes:
> Since commit d1bcae833b32f1 ("ELF: Don't generate unused section
> symbols") [1], binutils (v2.36+) started dropping section symbols that
> it thought were unused. This isn't an issue in
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2022 23:48:28 +0530 "Naveen N. Rao"
wrote:
Since commit d1bcae833b32f1 ("ELF: Don't generate unused section
symbols") [1], binutils (v2.36+) started dropping section symbols that
it thought were unused. This isn't an issue in general, but with
"Naveen N. Rao" writes:
> Since commit d1bcae833b32f1 ("ELF: Don't generate unused section
> symbols") [1], binutils (v2.36+) started dropping section symbols that
> it thought were unused. This isn't an issue in general, but with
> kexec_file.c, gcc is placing kexec_arch_apply_relocations[_add]
Hi Eric,
On 05/18/22 at 04:59pm, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Naveen N. Rao" writes:
>
> > Since commit d1bcae833b32f1 ("ELF: Don't generate unused section
> > symbols") [1], binutils (v2.36+) started dropping section symbols that
> > it thought were unused. This isn't an issue in general, but
"Naveen N. Rao" writes:
> Since commit d1bcae833b32f1 ("ELF: Don't generate unused section
> symbols") [1], binutils (v2.36+) started dropping section symbols that
> it thought were unused. This isn't an issue in general, but with
> kexec_file.c, gcc is placing
On Wed, 18 May 2022 23:48:28 +0530 "Naveen N. Rao"
wrote:
> Since commit d1bcae833b32f1 ("ELF: Don't generate unused section
> symbols") [1], binutils (v2.36+) started dropping section symbols that
> it thought were unused. This isn't an issue in general, but with
> kexec_file.c, gcc is
Since commit d1bcae833b32f1 ("ELF: Don't generate unused section
symbols") [1], binutils (v2.36+) started dropping section symbols that
it thought were unused. This isn't an issue in general, but with
kexec_file.c, gcc is placing kexec_arch_apply_relocations[_add] into a
separate .text.unlikely
12 matches
Mail list logo