On 07/02/20 at 12:01am, Hari Bathini wrote:
>
>
> On 01/07/20 1:16 pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 06/29/20 at 05:26pm, Hari Bathini wrote:
> >> Hi Petr,
> >>
> >> On 29/06/20 5:09 pm, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> >>> Hi Hari,
> >>>
> >>> is there any good reason to add two more functions with a very simil
On 01/07/20 1:16 pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 06/29/20 at 05:26pm, Hari Bathini wrote:
>> Hi Petr,
>>
>> On 29/06/20 5:09 pm, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>>> Hi Hari,
>>>
>>> is there any good reason to add two more functions with a very similar
>>> name to an existing function? AFAICS all you need is a w
On 06/29/20 at 05:26pm, Hari Bathini wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> On 29/06/20 5:09 pm, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > Hi Hari,
> >
> > is there any good reason to add two more functions with a very similar
> > name to an existing function? AFAICS all you need is a way to call a
> > PPC64-specific function from
Hi Petr,
On 29/06/20 5:09 pm, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> Hi Hari,
>
> is there any good reason to add two more functions with a very similar
> name to an existing function? AFAICS all you need is a way to call a
> PPC64-specific function from within kexec_add_buffer (PATCH 4/11), so
> you could add so
Hi Hari,
is there any good reason to add two more functions with a very similar
name to an existing function? AFAICS all you need is a way to call a
PPC64-specific function from within kexec_add_buffer (PATCH 4/11), so
you could add something like this:
int __weak arch_kexec_locate_mem_hole(struc
On 28/06/20 7:58 am, piliu wrote:
> Hi Hari,
>
> If in [4/11], get_exclude_memory_ranges() turns out to be unnecessary
> ,then this patch is abundant either. As my understanding, memblock has
> already helped to achieved the purpose that get_exclude_memory_ranges()
> wants.
As mentioned in th
Hi Hari,
If in [4/11], get_exclude_memory_ranges() turns out to be unnecessary
,then this patch is abundant either. As my understanding, memblock has
already helped to achieved the purpose that get_exclude_memory_ranges()
wants.
Thanks,
Pingfan
On 06/27/2020 03:04 AM, Hari Bathini wrote:
> Some
Le 26/06/2020 à 21:04, Hari Bathini a écrit :
Some archs can have special memory regions, within the given memory
range, which can't be used for the buffer in a kexec segment. As
kexec_add_buffer() function is being called from generic code as well,
add weak arch_kexec_add_buffer definition fo
