On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:49:08AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
The patch introduce a regression on imx6q boot. The IOMUXC block on
imx6q is special. It acts not only a pin controller but also a system
controller with a bunch of system level registers in there. That's why
we currently
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:43:20PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
It also breaks all of_amba_device users.
of_amba_device_create() -- amba_device_add() -- request_resource()
and fails.
Presumably that's because we no longer know what the parent resource
is supposed to be?
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:43:20PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
The patch introduce a regression on imx6q boot. The IOMUXC block on
imx6q is special. It acts not only a pin controller but also a system
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:03:35AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 01:40:00AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
This allows platform_device_add a chance to call insert_resource on all
of the resources from OF. At
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 01:40:00AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
This allows platform_device_add a chance to call insert_resource on all
of the resources from OF. At a minimum this fills in proc/iomem and
presumably makes resource tracking and conflict detection work better.
However, it has the
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:03:35AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 01:40:00AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
This allows platform_device_add a chance to call insert_resource on all
of the resources from OF. At a minimum this fills in proc/iomem and
presumably makes resource
This allows platform_device_add a chance to call insert_resource on all
of the resources from OF. At a minimum this fills in proc/iomem and
presumably makes resource tracking and conflict detection work better.
However, it has the side effect of moving all OF generated platform
devices from
