[PATCH V2] powerpc: Fail remap_4k_pfn() if PFN doesn't fit inside PTE

2014-07-10 Thread Madhusudanan Kandasamy
V2 : Rewritten to avoid helper function as suggested by Stephen Rothwell.
remap_4k_pfn() silently truncates upper bits of input 4K PFN if
it cannot be contained in PTE. This leads invalid memory mapping
and could result in a system crash when the memory is accessed.
This patch fails remap_4k_pfn() and returns -EINVAL if the input
4K PFN cannot be contained in PTE.

Signed-off-by: Madhusudanan Kandasamy kma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h 
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h
index d836d94..b5178e4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h
@@ -75,7 +75,8 @@
(((pte)  _PAGE_COMBO)? MMU_PAGE_4K: MMU_PAGE_64K)

 #define remap_4k_pfn(vma, addr, pfn, prot) \
-   remap_pfn_range((vma), (addr), (pfn), PAGE_SIZE,\
+   WARN_ON((pfn = (1UL  (64 - PTE_RPN_SHIFT ? -EINVAL : \
+   remap_pfn_range((vma), (addr), (pfn), PAGE_SIZE,\
__pgprot(pgprot_val((prot)) | _PAGE_4K_PFN))

 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
-- 
2.0.1

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Fail remap_4k_pfn() if PFN doesn't fit inside PTE

2014-07-10 Thread Brian W Hart
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:12:19PM +0530, Madhusudanan Kandasamy wrote:
 V2 : Rewritten to avoid helper function as suggested by Stephen Rothwell.
 remap_4k_pfn() silently truncates upper bits of input 4K PFN if
 it cannot be contained in PTE. This leads invalid memory mapping
 and could result in a system crash when the memory is accessed.
 This patch fails remap_4k_pfn() and returns -EINVAL if the input
 4K PFN cannot be contained in PTE.
 
 Signed-off-by: Madhusudanan Kandasamy kma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
 ---
  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
 diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h 
 b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h
 index d836d94..b5178e4 100644
 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h
 +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h
 @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@
   (((pte)  _PAGE_COMBO)? MMU_PAGE_4K: MMU_PAGE_64K)
 
  #define remap_4k_pfn(vma, addr, pfn, prot)   \
 - remap_pfn_range((vma), (addr), (pfn), PAGE_SIZE,\
 + WARN_ON((pfn = (1UL  (64 - PTE_RPN_SHIFT ? -EINVAL : \
 + remap_pfn_range((vma), (addr), (pfn), PAGE_SIZE,\
   __pgprot(pgprot_val((prot)) | _PAGE_4K_PFN))
 
  #endif   /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 -- 
 2.0.1

Chatted with Madhu.  He'll send a new version that adds some
parentheses to protect 'pfn' inside the macro and the entire macro
against use cases like:

!remap_4k_pfn(...)

brian

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev