On 11/20/2012 02:55 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/20/2012 02:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But
even if
we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we
At 11/20/2012 02:58 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/20/2012 02:55 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/20/2012 02:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does
On 11/20/2012 05:37 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/20/2012 02:58 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/20/2012 02:55 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/20/2012 02:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Currently
On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But even if
we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we can unregister the memory_section.
So the patch add unregister_memory_section() into
At 11/20/2012 07:16 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But
even if
we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we can unregister the memory_section.
So the
On 11/21/2012 11:05 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/20/2012 07:16 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But
even if
we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we
At 11/21/2012 12:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/21/2012 11:05 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/20/2012 07:16 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does
On 11/21/2012 12:42 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/21/2012 12:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/21/2012 11:05 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/20/2012 07:16 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Currently
At 11/21/2012 01:03 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/21/2012 12:42 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/21/2012 12:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/21/2012 11:05 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/20/2012 07:16 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
At 11/21/2012 01:03 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/21/2012 12:42 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/21/2012 12:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/21/2012 11:05 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/20/2012 07:16 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
At 11/20/2012 02:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But
even if
we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we can unregister the memory_section.
So the
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But even if
we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we can unregister the memory_section.
So the patch add unregister_memory_section() into __remove_section().
CC: David Rientjes
12 matches
Mail list logo