Hi Nayna,
>> I guess I also somewhat object to calling it a 'backend' if we're using
>> it as a version scheme. I think the skiboot storage backends are true
>> backends - they provide different implementations of the same
>> functionality with the same API, but this seems like you're using it to
On 06/12/2019 07:04 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
Hi Nayna,
Since OPAL can support different types of backend which can vary in the
variable interpretation, a new OPAL API call named OPAL_SECVAR_BACKEND, is
added to retrieve the supported backend version. This helps the consumer
to know how to
Hi Nayna,
>>> Since OPAL can support different types of backend which can vary in the
>>> variable interpretation, a new OPAL API call named OPAL_SECVAR_BACKEND, is
>>> added to retrieve the supported backend version. This helps the consumer
>>> to know how to interpret the variable.
>>>
>>
On 06/12/2019 02:17 AM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
Nayna Jain writes:
From: Claudio Carvalho
The X.509 certificates trusted by the platform and other information
required to secure boot the OS kernel are wrapped in secure variables,
which are controlled by OPAL.
This patch adds support to read
Nayna Jain writes:
> From: Claudio Carvalho
>
> The X.509 certificates trusted by the platform and other information
> required to secure boot the OS kernel are wrapped in secure variables,
> which are controlled by OPAL.
>
> This patch adds support to read OPAL secure variables through
>
From: Claudio Carvalho
The X.509 certificates trusted by the platform and other information
required to secure boot the OS kernel are wrapped in secure variables,
which are controlled by OPAL.
This patch adds support to read OPAL secure variables through
OPAL_SECVAR_GET call. It returns the
