W dniu 28.06.2015 06:27, Timur Tabi pisze:
Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
+if (newbinding fsl_ssi_is_ac97(ssi_private)) {
Is the newbinding necessary? I thought only the original PowerPC device
trees were the only one that have the old binding, and they never supported
AC97.
If there
Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
If there isn't going to be new platforms added with old bindings then this
won't be needed - I'll remove it.
I would love it if someone would port those original device trees to the
new binding, so that we can get rid of the old one. But we should
definitely not
Currently the AC'97 mode in fsl_ssi driver isn't functional.
This patch implements the following changes to make it work
properly:
* IPG clock have to be enabled during AC'97 CODEC
register access,
* AC'97 DAI driver struct need the same probe method as
I2S one to setup DMA params,
* AC'97 bus
Hello Fabio,
W dniu 28.06.2015 01:06, Fabio Estevam pisze:
Hi Maciej,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Maciej S. Szmigiero
m...@maciej.szmigiero.name wrote:
Currently the AC'97 mode in fsl_ssi driver isn't functional.
Thanks for the fix. I look forward to test it on my udoo board.
Hi Maciej,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Maciej S. Szmigiero
m...@maciej.szmigiero.name wrote:
Currently the AC'97 mode in fsl_ssi driver isn't functional.
Thanks for the fix. I look forward to test it on my udoo board.
This patch implements the following changes to make it work
properly:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Maciej S. Szmigiero
m...@maciej.szmigiero.name wrote:
+
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(fsl_ac97_data-clk);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err(ac97 read clk_prepare_enable failed: %d\n,
+ ret);
+ return -1;
Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
+ if (newbinding fsl_ssi_is_ac97(ssi_private)) {
Is the newbinding necessary? I thought only the original PowerPC
device trees were the only one that have the old binding, and they never
supported AC97.
___
