On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Victor Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I can tell, you don't even need this patch or the defconfig.
Nothing differs at this point from Glacier other than the DTS. Since
U-Boot is your loader, it should be able to pass the different DTS
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Victor Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ppc4xx: Add AMCC Arches 460GT eval board support
Signed-off-by: Victor Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please put a brief description of Arches in the patch description.
Best regards,
Stefan
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:33:26 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Victor Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ppc4xx: Add AMCC Arches 460GT eval board support
Signed-off-by: Victor Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From what I can tell, you don't even need this patch or the defconfig.
Nothing differs at
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:50:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:33:26 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Victor Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ppc4xx: Add AMCC Arches 460GT eval board support
Signed-off-by: Victor Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From what I can
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:15:39 -0600
Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:50:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:33:26 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Victor Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ppc4xx: Add AMCC Arches 460GT eval board
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
And then you don't need this file at all. Just add a
amcc,canyonlands string to your root node compatible property.
No! Don't do this because it is not true!
Instead, add your board name to canyonlands.c in canyonlands_probe().
It's
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:37:52AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:15:39 -0600
Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:50:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
And then you don't need this file at all. Just add a
amcc,canyonlands string to your root
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:46:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
And then you don't need this file at all. Just add a
amcc,canyonlands string to your root node compatible property.
No! Don't do this because it is not true!
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
Shouldn't it be enough to have a common compatible value in each
of these boards, e.g. amcc,generic-ppc44x and then just ignore the
specific type unless you need to do something special?
This is bad for the same reason that amcc,44x-blah
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 00:58 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
Shouldn't it be enough to have a common compatible value in each
of these boards, e.g. amcc,generic-ppc44x and then just ignore the
specific type unless you need to do something
Shouldn't it be enough to have a common compatible value in each
of these boards, e.g. amcc,generic-ppc44x and then just ignore the
specific type unless you need to do something special?
This is bad for the same reason that amcc,44x-blah compatible
values
are bad in device nodes. The
And then you don't need this file at all. Just add a
amcc,canyonlands string to your root node compatible property.
No! Don't do this because it is not true!
If the board actually _is_ compatible to the canyonlands board (it
only _adds_ stuff, doesn't change things or takes away things), it
Shouldn't it be enough to have a common compatible value in each
of these boards, e.g. amcc,generic-ppc44x and then just ignore the
specific type unless you need to do something special?
This is bad for the same reason that amcc,44x-blah compatible
values
are bad in device nodes. The
13 matches
Mail list logo
