On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:17:59PM -0800, Ray Lee wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Mark Brown
I'm rather hoping that they'll notice the mailing list thread or that
someone else who knows what's going on with them does
Surely you're joking. I mean, do _you_ scan every message that
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:22:15 + Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig
index 2657299..99e3c52 100644
--- a/kernel/power/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig
@@ -1,23 +1,6 @@
config PM
- bool Power
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:13:24AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:22:15 + Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
+ bool
+ default y if !IA64_HP_SIM
Several powerpc configs have CONFIG_PM (implicitly) disabled (e.g. the
server configs), so
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:18:29 + Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:13:24AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:22:15 + Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
+ bool
+ default y if
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:44:32AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:18:29 + Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
Do you mean that these systems require CONFIG_PM be turned off, or just
that people tend not to turn it on? If the latter would you
Hi Geert,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:00:55 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
$ git grep CONFIG_PM is not set
7cf3d73b4360e91b14326632ab1aeda4cb26308d^ -- arch/ | wc -l
256
$
7cf3d73b4360e91b14326632ab1aeda4cb26308d is the commit that introduced
savedefconfig, so that's a
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 02:10:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:00:55 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
$ git grep CONFIG_PM is not set
7cf3d73b4360e91b14326632ab1aeda4cb26308d^ -- arch/ | wc -l
256
$
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:19:16AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
At least some of the powerpc defconfigs were added with CONFIG_PM
disabled. I assume that was on purpose (though it may not have been).
I'd not be so sure - since it's a bool without an explicit default set
Kconfig will default
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:19:16AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
At least some of the powerpc defconfigs were added with CONFIG_PM
disabled. I assume that was on purpose (though it may not have been).
I'd not be so sure - since it's a bool without
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:36:31AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
I'd not be so sure - since it's a bool without an explicit default set
Kconfig will default to disabling it and if anything enabling it is the
option that requires special effort.
This may
On Monday, February 07, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:36:31AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
I'd not be so sure - since it's a bool without an explicit default set
Kconfig will default to disabling it and if anything enabling it is
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
I'm rather hoping that they'll notice the mailing list thread or that
someone else who knows what's going on with them does
Surely you're joking. I mean, do _you_ scan every message that comes
through lkml and
12 matches
Mail list logo
