From: Joerg Roedel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:03:28 +0200
That may be the reason that your fix is not yet upstream.
The reason is more-so because Linus simply hasn't merged more
than a couple of patches since 2.6.27-rc1 was released.
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Joerg Roedel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:03:28 +0200
That may be the reason that your fix is not yet upstream.
The reason is more-so because Linus simply hasn't merged more
than a couple
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 08:51:23AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:43:23 +1000
Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This reverts commit 29111f579f4f3f2a07385f931854ab0527ae7ea5.
This undoes the hasty addition of a global version of iommu_num_pages()
that broke
This reverts commit 29111f579f4f3f2a07385f931854ab0527ae7ea5.
This undoes the hasty addition of a global version of iommu_num_pages()
that broke both the powerpc and sparc builds. This function can be
revisited later.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:43:23 +1000
Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This reverts commit 29111f579f4f3f2a07385f931854ab0527ae7ea5.
This undoes the hasty addition of a global version of iommu_num_pages()
that broke both the powerpc and sparc builds. This function can be
revisited
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:51:23 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo has a patch to fix this problem in the x86 tree:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=121754062325903w=2
Then consider this a poke (to the appropriate person) to get something
merged to fix the breakage.
--
