Re: [PATCH] booting-without-of: add more bindings for FSL UPM driver

2008-06-26 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Hi Segher, Segher Boessenkool wrote: + - chip-delay : may specify a delay value in milliseconds. Delay for what? The binding should say. chip-delay is a bit too generic name as well, it could be more descriptive perhaps. The chip-delay property defines an appropriate maximum delay

Re: [PATCH] booting-without-of: add more bindings for FSL UPM driver

2008-06-12 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Segher Boessenkool wrote: + - chip-delay : may specify a delay value in milliseconds. Delay for what? The binding should say. chip-delay is a bit too generic name as well, it could be more descriptive perhaps. The chip-delay property defines an appropriate maximum delay time (tR)

Re: [PATCH] booting-without-of: add more bindings for FSL UPM driver

2008-06-09 Thread Segher Boessenkool
+ - chip-delay : may specify a delay value in milliseconds. Delay for what? The binding should say. chip-delay is a bit too generic name as well, it could be more descriptive perhaps. Shouldn't this be a property of the NAND device anyway, not the NAND controller? Segher

Re: [PATCH] booting-without-of: add more bindings for FSL UPM driver

2008-06-09 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Segher Boessenkool wrote: + - chip-delay : may specify a delay value in milliseconds. Delay for what? The binding should say. chip-delay is a bit too generic name as well, it could be more descriptive perhaps. The chip-delay property defines an appropriate maximum delay time (tR)

Re: [PATCH] booting-without-of: add more bindings for FSL UPM driver

2008-06-09 Thread Segher Boessenkool
+ - chip-delay : may specify a delay value in milliseconds. Delay for what? The binding should say. chip-delay is a bit too generic name as well, it could be more descriptive perhaps. The chip-delay property defines an appropriate maximum delay time (tR) required for read operations if