On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 07:41:23PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:32:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced with
corresponding pr_* macros
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee su...@vectorindia.org
Your
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:32:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced with
corresponding pr_* macros
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee su...@vectorindia.org
Your patch doesn't even build:
CC [M] drivers/char/hw_random/intel-rng.o
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:32:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced with
corresponding pr_* macros
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee su...@vectorindia.org
---
The replacement was done by a bash script to avoid copy paste error.
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 20:32 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced with
corresponding pr_* macros
I suppose ...
drivers/char/hw_random/pasemi-rng.c | 2 +-
drivers/char/hw_random/pseries-rng.c | 2 +-
These look OK to me.
cheers
as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced with
corresponding pr_* macros
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee su...@vectorindia.org
---
The replacement was done by a bash script to avoid copy paste error. The script
is as follows :
OLD=printk(KERN_ERR \?
