Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Disable BTRFS on platforms having 256K pages

2022-01-10 Thread Christophe Leroy
Hi Qu, Le 05/01/2022 à 00:32, Qu Wenruo a écrit : > Hi Christophe, > > I'm recently enhancing the subpage support for btrfs, and my current > branch should solve the problem for btrfs to support larger page sizes. > > But unfortunately my current test environment can only provide page size >

Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Disable BTRFS on platforms having 256K pages

2022-01-06 Thread Michael Ellerman
Qu Wenruo writes: > On 2022/1/7 00:31, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:05 AM Qu Wenruo wrote: >>> >>> Hi Christophe, >>> >>> I'm recently enhancing the subpage support for btrfs, and my current >>> branch should solve the problem for btrfs to support larger page sizes. >>> >>> But

Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Disable BTRFS on platforms having 256K pages

2022-01-06 Thread Hector Martin
On 2022/01/07 9:13, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > On 2022/1/7 00:31, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:05 AM Qu Wenruo wrote: >>> >>> Hi Christophe, >>> >>> I'm recently enhancing the subpage support for btrfs, and my current >>> branch should solve the problem for btrfs to support larger

Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Disable BTRFS on platforms having 256K pages

2022-01-06 Thread Qu Wenruo
On 2022/1/7 00:31, Neal Gompa wrote: On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:05 AM Qu Wenruo wrote: Hi Christophe, I'm recently enhancing the subpage support for btrfs, and my current branch should solve the problem for btrfs to support larger page sizes. But unfortunately my current test environment

Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Disable BTRFS on platforms having 256K pages

2022-01-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:05 AM Qu Wenruo wrote: > > Hi Christophe, > > I'm recently enhancing the subpage support for btrfs, and my current > branch should solve the problem for btrfs to support larger page sizes. > > But unfortunately my current test environment can only provide page size > with

Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Disable BTRFS on platforms having 256K pages

2022-01-04 Thread Qu Wenruo
Hi Christophe, I'm recently enhancing the subpage support for btrfs, and my current branch should solve the problem for btrfs to support larger page sizes. But unfortunately my current test environment can only provide page size with 64K or 4K, no 16K or 128K/256K support. Mind to test my new

Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Disable BTRFS on platforms having 256K pages

2021-06-11 Thread Qu Wenruo
On 2021/6/10 下午1:23, Christophe Leroy wrote: With a config having PAGE_SIZE set to 256K, BTRFS build fails with the following message include/linux/compiler_types.h:326:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_791' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: (BTRFS_MAX_COMPRESSED

Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Disable BTRFS on platforms having 256K pages

2021-06-11 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 05:23:02AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > With a config having PAGE_SIZE set to 256K, BTRFS build fails > with the following message > > include/linux/compiler_types.h:326:38: error: call to > '__compiletime_assert_791' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON >

[PATCH] fs: btrfs: Disable BTRFS on platforms having 256K pages

2021-06-09 Thread Christophe Leroy
With a config having PAGE_SIZE set to 256K, BTRFS build fails with the following message include/linux/compiler_types.h:326:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_791' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: (BTRFS_MAX_COMPRESSED % PAGE_SIZE) != 0 BTRFS_MAX_COMPRESSED being