On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 07:59:03AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/gpio/led.txt
b/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/gpio/led.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000..7e9ce81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/gpio/led.txt
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:07:30 +0400
Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is tricky question. Personally I place them inside the gpio
controller node that is responsible for the LED. But I think placing
the led nodes at top level would be also fine (maybe with leds { }
node as a parent
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 03:07:30PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 07:59:03AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
What would be the parent node of this, btw?
This is tricky question. Personally I place them inside the gpio
controller node that is responsible for the LED.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:07:15AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 03:07:30PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 07:59:03AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
What would be the parent node of this, btw?
This is tricky question. Personally I place them
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:35:12PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
This brings us back to the issue we also have with DCR controlled
devices. Possibly we should have two ways of representing these
connections: for pure GPIO-only or DCR-only devices, they appear
under the relevant controller with
diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/gpio/led.txt
b/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/gpio/led.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000..7e9ce81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/gpio/led.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+LED connected to GPIO
+
+Required properties:
+-
