On Tue, 21 Sep 2021, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> This has served its purpose and is no longer used. All usercopy
> violations appear to have been handled by now, any remaining
> instances (or new bugs) will cause copies to be rejected.
>
> This isn't a direct revert of commit 2d891fbc3bb6 ("usercopy: A
On Tue, 21 Sept 2021 at 09:50, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>
> This has served its purpose and is no longer used. All usercopy
> violations appear to have been handled by now, any remaining
> instances (or new bugs) will cause copies to be rejected.
>
> This isn't a direct revert of commit 2d891fbc3bb6 ("
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 08:11:49AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> This has served its purpose and is no longer used. All usercopy
> violations appear to have been handled by now, any remaining
> instances (or new bugs) will cause copies to be rejected.
>
> This isn't a direct revert of commit 2d891f
This has served its purpose and is no longer used. All usercopy
violations appear to have been handled by now, any remaining
instances (or new bugs) will cause copies to be rejected.
This isn't a direct revert of commit 2d891fbc3bb6 ("usercopy: Allow
strict enforcement of whitelists"); since userc
