On Sep 8, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 14:21 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
struct smp_ops_t smp_85xx_ops = {
+ .message_pass = NULL,
+ .probe = NULL,
.kick_cpu = smp_85xx_kick_cpu,
+ .setup_cpu = NULL,
};
Why explicitely setting
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 14:21 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> struct smp_ops_t smp_85xx_ops = {
> + .message_pass = NULL,
> + .probe = NULL,
> .kick_cpu = smp_85xx_kick_cpu,
> + .setup_cpu = NULL,
> };
Why explicitely setting those to NULL ?
Cheers,
Ben.
> -static int __init sm
The following commit introduced a compile error since it removed
the implementation of smp_85xx_basic_setup:
commit 77c0a700c1c292edafa11c1e52821ce4636f81b0
Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Fri Aug 28 14:25:04 2009 +1000
powerpc: Properly start decrementer on BookE secondary CPUs
Make
