Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm/hash: Move the slb_addr_limit check within PPC_MM_SLICES

2018-03-30 Thread LEROY Christophe
Michael Ellerman a écrit : "Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes: Should not have any impact, because we always select PP_MM_SLICES these days. Nevertheless it is good to indicate that slb_addr_limit is available only with slice code. That file

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm/hash: Move the slb_addr_limit check within PPC_MM_SLICES

2018-03-30 Thread Michael Ellerman
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes: > Should not have any impact, because we always select PP_MM_SLICES these days. > Nevertheless it is good to indicate that slb_addr_limit is available only > with slice code. That file can only be built if PPC_MM_SLICES=y. So let's

[PATCH] powerpc/mm/hash: Move the slb_addr_limit check within PPC_MM_SLICES

2018-03-07 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Should not have any impact, because we always select PP_MM_SLICES these days. Nevertheless it is good to indicate that slb_addr_limit is available only with slice code. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2