Michael Neuling writes:
> Each POWER9 core is made of two super slices. Each super slice can
> only have one thread at a time in TM suspend mode. The super slice
> restricts ever entering a state where both threads are in suspend by
> aborting transactions on tsuspend or
> > This patch blocks this from happening on POWER9 but sanity checking
> > sigcontexts passed in.
>
> Should 'but' say 'by'?
Thanks
Mikey
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Each POWER9 core is made of two super slices. Each super slice can
> only have one thread at a time in TM suspend mode. The super slice
> restricts ever entering a state where both threads are in suspend by
> aborting
Each POWER9 core is made of two super slices. Each super slice can
only have one thread at a time in TM suspend mode. The super slice
restricts ever entering a state where both threads are in suspend by
aborting transactions on tsuspend or exceptions into the kernel.
Unfortunately for context