On Monday 15 June 2009, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Michael Ellermanmich...@ellerman.id.au
wrote:
arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/setup.c:378: error: the frame size of 1040
bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
What's so bad about a frame size larger than 1024?
It's not
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 16:48 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Add the option to build the code under arch/powerpc with -Werror.
The intention is to make it harder for people to inadvertantly introduce
warnings in the arch/powerpc code. It needs to be configurable so that
if a warning is
Currently this appears to break only one of the defconfigs, chrp32.
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/1907/
And that's a legitimate error AFAICT:
arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/setup.c:378: error: the frame size of 1040 bytes
is larger than 1024 bytes
From:
367 void
368
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 19:40 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Currently this appears to break only one of the defconfigs, chrp32.
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/1907/
And that's a legitimate error AFAICT:
arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/setup.c:378: error: the frame size
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Michael Ellermanmich...@ellerman.id.au wrote:
arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/setup.c:378: error: the frame size of 1040 bytes
is larger than 1024 bytes
What's so bad about a frame size larger than 1024?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
Yeah that occured to me, someone with a chrp machine would need to test
it, do we have one?
Yup, I think we do. I'll check that when I'm in the office.
We can have a closer look tomorrow. In any case, stack alloc for that is
indeed fishy.
The obvious patch to make it static doesn't fly
Add the option to build the code under arch/powerpc with -Werror.
The intention is to make it harder for people to inadvertantly introduce
warnings in the arch/powerpc code. It needs to be configurable so that
if a warning is introduced, people can easily work around it while it's
being fixed.
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:41PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
-Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
The intention is to make it harder for people to
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:41:38 +0200 (CEST) Geert Uytterhoeven
geert.uytterhoe...@sonycom.com wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Olof Johansson wrote:
This is really only beneficial if various people build for powerpc often
enough. If major subsystem maintainers aren't going to hit the errors
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:01:33AM +, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 21:27 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:41PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
-Werror, which causes gcc to
On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:00 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc
with
-Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
The intention is to make it harder for people to inadvertantly
introduce
errors in the arch/powerpc code. It
On Apr 5, 2009, at 11:18 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/math-emu/
Makefile
index 0c16ab9..dcb2148 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_PPC_WERROR),y)
Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
-Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
The intention is to make it harder for people to inadvertantly introduce
errors in the arch/powerpc code. It needs to be configurable so that
if a warning is introduced,
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:41PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
-Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
The intention is to make it harder for people to inadvertantly introduce
errors in the arch/powerpc
From: Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 21:27:43 -0500
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:41PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
-Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
The intention is to make
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:28:30PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 21:27:43 -0500
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:41PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
-Werror, which
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 21:27 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:41PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
-Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
The intention is to make it harder for
Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
-Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
The intention is to make it harder for people to inadvertantly introduce
errors in the arch/powerpc code. It needs to be configurable so that
if a warning is introduced,
18 matches
Mail list logo
