* Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com [2010-07-26 14:13:35]:
On 07/22/2010 11:13 PM, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
* Robert Jennings r...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2010-07-22 21:43:44]:
If a CPU remove is attempted using the 'release' interface on hardware
which supports extended cede, the
On 07/22/2010 11:13 PM, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
* Robert Jennings r...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2010-07-22 21:43:44]:
If a CPU remove is attempted using the 'release' interface on hardware
which supports extended cede, the CPU will be put in the INACTIVE state
rather than the OFFLINE state
If a CPU remove is attempted using the 'release' interface on hardware
which supports extended cede, the CPU will be put in the INACTIVE state
rather than the OFFLINE state due to the default preferred_offline_state
in that situation. In the INACTIVE state it will fail to be removed.
This patch
* Robert Jennings r...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2010-07-22 21:43:44]:
If a CPU remove is attempted using the 'release' interface on hardware
which supports extended cede, the CPU will be put in the INACTIVE state
rather than the OFFLINE state due to the default preferred_offline_state
in that
