On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:05:02PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
The irq remapping layer seems to cause some confusion when people
see a different irq number in /proc/interrupts vs the one they
request in their driver or DTS.
So have the irq remapping layer print out a message when we map
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 14:30 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:05:02PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
index 5576147..8c1a496 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
@@
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au wrote:
The irq remapping layer seems to cause some confusion when people
see a different irq number in /proc/interrupts vs the one they
request in their driver or DTS.
So have the irq remapping layer print out a message
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:05:02PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
The irq remapping layer seems to cause some confusion when people
see a different irq number in /proc/interrupts vs the one they
request in their driver or DTS.
So have the irq remapping layer print out a message when we map
The irq remapping layer seems to cause some confusion when people
see a different irq number in /proc/interrupts vs the one they
request in their driver or DTS.
So have the irq remapping layer print out a message when we map an
irq. The message is only printed the first time the irq is mapped,
