On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 09:11:31PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
65;5803;1c> If mtmsr L=1 sets MSR[EE] while there is a maskable exception
pending,
> it does not cause an interrupt. This causes the test case to hang:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2019-10/msg00826.html
>
> More
Cédric Le Goater writes:
> On 4/14/20 1:11 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> If mtmsr L=1 sets MSR[EE] while there is a maskable exception pending,
>> it does not cause an interrupt. This causes the test case to hang:
>>
>>
Excerpts from Cédric Le Goater's message of April 15, 2020 4:49 pm:
> On 4/14/20 1:11 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>
>> The confusion arises from L=0 being "context synchronizing" whereas L=1
>> is "execution synchronizing", which is a weaker semantic. However this
>> is not a relaxation of the
On 4/14/20 1:11 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> If mtmsr L=1 sets MSR[EE] while there is a maskable exception pending,
> it does not cause an interrupt. This causes the test case to hang:
>
>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 09:11:31PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> If mtmsr L=1 sets MSR[EE] while there is a maskable exception pending,
> it does not cause an interrupt. This causes the test case to hang:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2019-10/msg00826.html
>
> More recently,
If mtmsr L=1 sets MSR[EE] while there is a maskable exception pending,
it does not cause an interrupt. This causes the test case to hang:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2019-10/msg00826.html
More recently, Linux reduced the occurance of operations (e.g., rfi)
which stop translation
