Re: [PATCH] workaround for mpc52xx erratum #364 (serial may not be reset in break state)

2008-11-04 Thread Matt Sealey
Wolfram Sang wrote: On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:57:09PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote: Optionally you can further reduce impact by checking if CONFIG_PPC_MPC5200_BUGFIX is defined. I would much prefer this. I submitted a patch to enable pipelining on a MPC5200B recently. It was disabled because

[PATCH] workaround for mpc52xx erratum #364 (serial may not be reset in break state)

2008-11-03 Thread René Bürgel
Hi This patch is a workaround for bug #364 found in the MPC52xx processor. The errata document can be found under http://www.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/errata/MPC5200E.pdf?fpsp=1WT_TYPE=ErrataWT_VENDOR=FREESCALEWT_FILE_FORMAT=pdfWT_ASSET=Documentation When a device with a low baudrate is

Re: [PATCH] workaround for mpc52xx erratum #364 (serial may not be reset in break state)

2008-11-03 Thread Matt Sealey
Grant Likely wrote: On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:32 PM, René Bürgel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi This patch is a workaround for bug #364 found in the MPC52xx processor. The errata document can be found under

Re: [PATCH] workaround for mpc52xx erratum #364 (serial may not be reset in break state)

2008-11-03 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:57:09PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote: Optionally you can further reduce impact by checking if CONFIG_PPC_MPC5200_BUGFIX is defined. I would much prefer this. I submitted a patch to enable pipelining on a MPC5200B recently. It was disabled because of a bug in the

Re: [PATCH] workaround for mpc52xx erratum #364 (serial may not be reset in break state)

2008-11-03 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Wolfram Sang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:57:09PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote: Optionally you can further reduce impact by checking if CONFIG_PPC_MPC5200_BUGFIX is defined. I would much prefer this. I submitted a patch to enable