On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 09:22 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> ah, yes, they are stable/fine. I've put it into a separate branch
> for you.
>
> Ben, please pull the latest iommu-for-powerpc git tree from:
>
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git
> iommu-for-powerpc
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 13:12 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Ok! We could also stage it a bit (one or two weeks) in a separate
> > branch and allow a rebase, should you find any bugs during testing?
>
> Allright so after various d
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Ok! We could also stage it a bit (one or two weeks) in a separate
> branch and allow a rebase, should you find any bugs during testing?
Allright so after various delays and sidetracking on my side, the
patches have been in my -test branch f
On Aug 13, 2009, at 5:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Or we can have the patches in core/iommu and I pull the whole
thing in powerpc-next. [...]
Ok! We could also stage it a bit (one or two weeks) in a separate
branch and allow a re
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Or we can have the patches in core/iommu and I pull the whole
> > thing in powerpc-next. [...]
>
> Ok! We could also stage it a bit (one or two weeks) in a separate
> branch and allow a rebase, should you find any bugs during testing?
S
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > Ben, what's your preference? I waited for your reaction with these
> > bits, i.e. they are not in tip:core/iommu yet.
>
> Oh I though they were... discard my previous private mail about
> missing Ack's then :-)
>
> I'll review them more in depth hopeful
* FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:48:42 +1000
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:08 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >
> > > The above swiotlb patchset was merged in -tip so I think that merging
> > > this patchset via -tip too is the easiest way to
At Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:07:57 +1000,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 09:11 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > I'm willing to rebase my patches to the generic dma_ops, so feel free
> > to pull it first.
>
> I think I'll end up pulling Ingo's iommu branch into powerpc-next to
> g
> Ben, what's your preference? I waited for your reaction with these
> bits, i.e. they are not in tip:core/iommu yet.
Oh I though they were... discard my previous private mail about
missing Ack's then :-)
I'll review them more in depth hopefully tomorrow but they look good.
> One variant would
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 09:11 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> I'm willing to rebase my patches to the generic dma_ops, so feel free
> to pull it first.
I think I'll end up pulling Ingo's iommu branch into powerpc-next to
get Fujita stuff, so if you rebase on top of his stuff, it will come
along just fi
At Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:51:53 +1000,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:44 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:08 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >
> > > The above swiotlb patchset was merged in -tip so I think that merging
> > > this patchset
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:48:42 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:08 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> > The above swiotlb patchset was merged in -tip so I think that merging
> > this patchset via -tip too is the easiest way to handle this patchset.
> >
> > The patchse
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:44 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:08 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> > The above swiotlb patchset was merged in -tip so I think that merging
> > this patchset via -tip too is the easiest way to handle this patchset.
> >
> > The patchset
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:08 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> The above swiotlb patchset was merged in -tip so I think that merging
> this patchset via -tip too is the easiest way to handle this patchset.
>
> The patchset also is available via a git tree:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ker
This is the second version of the patchset to convert POWERPC to use
asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124840628128189&w=2
There are some minor changes since the first version are:
- removed unused CONFIG_PPC_NEED_DMA_SYNC_OPS [5/7] (Becky pointed
out).
- ad
15 matches
Mail list logo
