Re: Ang: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously

2009-08-04 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote on 15/07/2009 00:09:31: On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:20:13PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: [...] But any users of the legacy bindings should be in-tree. ehh, it was working until you made it OF only. Why do call the native way legacy? It is

Re: Ang: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously

2009-08-04 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:38:40PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote on 15/07/2009 00:09:31: On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:20:13PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: [...] But any users of the legacy bindings should be in-tree. ehh, it was

Re: Ang: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously

2009-08-04 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote on 04/08/2009 16:22:50: On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:38:40PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote on 15/07/2009 00:09:31: On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:20:13PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: [...]

Ang: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously

2009-07-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Ärende: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:59:54PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: [...] While being at it, the reason for me needing this is that the spi_mpc83xx driver was recently converted to a OF only driver so I have no way of defining my own CS

Re: Ang: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously

2009-07-14 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:20:13PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: [...] But any users of the legacy bindings should be in-tree. ehh, it was working until you made it OF only. Why do call the native way legacy? It is the method all non OF arch uses. It's legacy because there are no in-tree

[PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously

2009-07-13 Thread Anton Vorontsov
Hi all, I've been sitting on these patches for some time, but now it appears that the set_sync() feature is needed elsewhere. So here are the patches. Joakim, I think this is what you need. Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmai...@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously

2009-07-13 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote on 13/07/2009 17:19:11: Hi all, I've been sitting on these patches for some time, but now it appears that the set_sync() feature is needed elsewhere. So here are the patches. Joakim, I think this is what you need. Yes, it sure looks so :) I

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously

2009-07-13 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode wrote on 13/07/2009 18:01:02: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote on 13/07/2009 17:19:11: Hi all, I've been sitting on these patches for some time, but now it appears that the set_sync() feature is needed elsewhere. So here are the patches.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously

2009-07-13 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:01:02PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote on 13/07/2009 17:19:11: Hi all, I've been sitting on these patches for some time, but now it appears that the set_sync() feature is needed elsewhere. So here are the

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously

2009-07-13 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:59:54PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: [...] While being at it, the reason for me needing this is that the spi_mpc83xx driver was recently converted to a OF only driver so I have no way of defining my own CS function anymore. While OF is good I don't