Re: [PATCH 01/12] mfd/sm501: depend on HAS_DMA

2019-02-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 07:29:31AM +, Lee Jones wrote: > I would normally have taken this, but I fear it will conflict with > [PATCH 06/12]. For that reason, just take my: > > Acked-by: Lee Jones Yes, I'll need it for the later patches in the series. Thanks for the review.

Re: [PATCH 01/12] mfd/sm501: depend on HAS_DMA

2019-02-13 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Currently the sm501 mfd driver can be compiled without any dependencies, > but through the use of dma_declare_coherent it really depends on > having DMA and iomem support. Normally we don't explicitly require DMA > support as we have stubs for it

[PATCH 01/12] mfd/sm501: depend on HAS_DMA

2019-02-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Currently the sm501 mfd driver can be compiled without any dependencies, but through the use of dma_declare_coherent it really depends on having DMA and iomem support. Normally we don't explicitly require DMA support as we have stubs for it if on UML, but in this case the driver selects support