Re: [PATCH 02/12][v3] pci: fsl: add structure fsl_pci
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 13:58 +0800, Lian Minghuan-b31939 wrote: Hi Kumar, please see my comment inline. On 10/24/2013 12:11 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Minghuan Lian wrote: PowerPC uses structure pci_controller to describe PCI controller, but ARM uses structure pci_sys_data. In order to support PowerPC and ARM simultaneously, the patch adds a structure fsl_pci that contains most of the members of the pci_controller and pci_sys_data. Meanwhile, it defines a interface fsl_arch_sys_to_pci() which should be implemented in architecture-specific PCI controller driver to convert pci_controller or pci_sys_data to fsl_pci. Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian minghuan.l...@freescale.com --- change log: v1-v3: Derived from http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278965/ Based on upstream master. Based on the discussion of RFC version here http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/274487/ include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h | 41 + 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) NAK. We discussed this some at the ARM Summit this week and the feeling is we need to move to a common interface between the various ARCHs. [Minghuan] Do you mean we will use the common interface instead of arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c... and arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c? Who will do the code movement and when will the work be completed? The patches just move the common functions of FSL PCI controller operation which can be re-used by PowerPC and ARM. LS1 is coming, I worry about not having enough time to wait for the move is completed. I agree -- it can take quite a while to get from the feeling is we need to move to a common interface to actually having something we can use. If and when this unification is achieved, we can drop this extra layer. It's a better interim solution than just duplicating the entire driver and letting them drift apart. -Scott ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH 02/12][v3] pci: fsl: add structure fsl_pci
Hi Kumar, please see my comment inline. On 10/24/2013 12:11 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Minghuan Lian wrote: PowerPC uses structure pci_controller to describe PCI controller, but ARM uses structure pci_sys_data. In order to support PowerPC and ARM simultaneously, the patch adds a structure fsl_pci that contains most of the members of the pci_controller and pci_sys_data. Meanwhile, it defines a interface fsl_arch_sys_to_pci() which should be implemented in architecture-specific PCI controller driver to convert pci_controller or pci_sys_data to fsl_pci. Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian minghuan.l...@freescale.com --- change log: v1-v3: Derived from http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278965/ Based on upstream master. Based on the discussion of RFC version here http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/274487/ include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h | 41 + 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) NAK. We discussed this some at the ARM Summit this week and the feeling is we need to move to a common interface between the various ARCHs. [Minghuan] Do you mean we will use the common interface instead of arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c... and arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c? Who will do the code movement and when will the work be completed? The patches just move the common functions of FSL PCI controller operation which can be re-used by PowerPC and ARM. LS1 is coming, I worry about not having enough time to wait for the move is completed. - k diff --git a/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h b/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h index 5e4f683..e56a040 100644 --- a/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h +++ b/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h @@ -102,5 +102,46 @@ struct ccsr_pci { }; +/* + * Structure of a PCI controller (host bridge) + */ +struct fsl_pci { + struct list_head node; + bool is_pcie; + struct device_node *dn; + struct device *dev; + + int first_busno; + int last_busno; + int self_busno; + struct resource busn; + + struct pci_ops *ops; + struct ccsr_pci __iomem *regs; + + u32 indirect_type; + + struct resource io_resource; + resource_size_t io_base_phys; + resource_size_t pci_io_size; + + struct resource mem_resources[3]; + resource_size_t mem_offset[3]; + + int global_number; /* PCI domain number */ + + resource_size_t dma_window_base_cur; + resource_size_t dma_window_size; + + void *sys; +}; + +/* + * Convert architecture specific pci controller structure to fsl_pci + * PowerPC uses structure pci_controller and ARM uses structure pci_sys_data + * to describe pci controller. + */ +extern struct fsl_pci *fsl_arch_sys_to_pci(void *sys); + #endif /* __PCI_COMMON_H */ #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ -- 1.8.1.2 ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
[PATCH 02/12][v3] pci: fsl: add structure fsl_pci
PowerPC uses structure pci_controller to describe PCI controller, but ARM uses structure pci_sys_data. In order to support PowerPC and ARM simultaneously, the patch adds a structure fsl_pci that contains most of the members of the pci_controller and pci_sys_data. Meanwhile, it defines a interface fsl_arch_sys_to_pci() which should be implemented in architecture-specific PCI controller driver to convert pci_controller or pci_sys_data to fsl_pci. Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian minghuan.l...@freescale.com --- change log: v1-v3: Derived from http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278965/ Based on upstream master. Based on the discussion of RFC version here http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/274487/ include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h | 41 + 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h b/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h index 5e4f683..e56a040 100644 --- a/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h +++ b/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h @@ -102,5 +102,46 @@ struct ccsr_pci { }; +/* + * Structure of a PCI controller (host bridge) + */ +struct fsl_pci { + struct list_head node; + bool is_pcie; + struct device_node *dn; + struct device *dev; + + int first_busno; + int last_busno; + int self_busno; + struct resource busn; + + struct pci_ops *ops; + struct ccsr_pci __iomem *regs; + + u32 indirect_type; + + struct resource io_resource; + resource_size_t io_base_phys; + resource_size_t pci_io_size; + + struct resource mem_resources[3]; + resource_size_t mem_offset[3]; + + int global_number; /* PCI domain number */ + + resource_size_t dma_window_base_cur; + resource_size_t dma_window_size; + + void *sys; +}; + +/* + * Convert architecture specific pci controller structure to fsl_pci + * PowerPC uses structure pci_controller and ARM uses structure pci_sys_data + * to describe pci controller. + */ +extern struct fsl_pci *fsl_arch_sys_to_pci(void *sys); + #endif /* __PCI_COMMON_H */ #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ -- 1.8.1.2 ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH 02/12][v3] pci: fsl: add structure fsl_pci
On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Minghuan Lian wrote: PowerPC uses structure pci_controller to describe PCI controller, but ARM uses structure pci_sys_data. In order to support PowerPC and ARM simultaneously, the patch adds a structure fsl_pci that contains most of the members of the pci_controller and pci_sys_data. Meanwhile, it defines a interface fsl_arch_sys_to_pci() which should be implemented in architecture-specific PCI controller driver to convert pci_controller or pci_sys_data to fsl_pci. Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian minghuan.l...@freescale.com --- change log: v1-v3: Derived from http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278965/ Based on upstream master. Based on the discussion of RFC version here http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/274487/ include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h | 41 + 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) NAK. We discussed this some at the ARM Summit this week and the feeling is we need to move to a common interface between the various ARCHs. - k diff --git a/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h b/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h index 5e4f683..e56a040 100644 --- a/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h +++ b/include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h @@ -102,5 +102,46 @@ struct ccsr_pci { }; +/* + * Structure of a PCI controller (host bridge) + */ +struct fsl_pci { + struct list_head node; + bool is_pcie; + struct device_node *dn; + struct device *dev; + + int first_busno; + int last_busno; + int self_busno; + struct resource busn; + + struct pci_ops *ops; + struct ccsr_pci __iomem *regs; + + u32 indirect_type; + + struct resource io_resource; + resource_size_t io_base_phys; + resource_size_t pci_io_size; + + struct resource mem_resources[3]; + resource_size_t mem_offset[3]; + + int global_number; /* PCI domain number */ + + resource_size_t dma_window_base_cur; + resource_size_t dma_window_size; + + void *sys; +}; + +/* + * Convert architecture specific pci controller structure to fsl_pci + * PowerPC uses structure pci_controller and ARM uses structure pci_sys_data + * to describe pci controller. + */ +extern struct fsl_pci *fsl_arch_sys_to_pci(void *sys); + #endif /* __PCI_COMMON_H */ #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ -- 1.8.1.2 ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
RE: [PATCH 02/12][v3] pci: fsl: add structure fsl_pci
-Original Message- From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 11:11 PM To: Lian Minghuan-B31939 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list; Arnd Bergmann; Zang Roy-R61911; Wood Scott-B07421; Bjorn Helgaas; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- ker...@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12][v3] pci: fsl: add structure fsl_pci On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Minghuan Lian wrote: PowerPC uses structure pci_controller to describe PCI controller, but ARM uses structure pci_sys_data. In order to support PowerPC and ARM simultaneously, the patch adds a structure fsl_pci that contains most of the members of the pci_controller and pci_sys_data. Meanwhile, it defines a interface fsl_arch_sys_to_pci() which should be implemented in architecture-specific PCI controller driver to convert pci_controller or pci_sys_data to fsl_pci. Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian minghuan.l...@freescale.com --- change log: v1-v3: Derived from http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/278965/ Based on upstream master. Based on the discussion of RFC version here http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/274487/ include/linux/fsl/pci-common.h | 41 + 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) NAK. We discussed this some at the ARM Summit this week and the feeling is we need to move to a common interface between the various ARCHs. Can you share more about the *common interface*? Any plan to implement the * common interface*? Thanks. Roy ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev