On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 12:03:48AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Acked-by: Guo Ren
>
> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 06:28:32PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > The csky implementation pte_alloc_one(), pte_free_kernel() and pte_free()
> > is identical to the generic except of lack of
Hi Mike,
Acked-by: Guo Ren
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 06:28:32PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> The csky implementation pte_alloc_one(), pte_free_kernel() and pte_free()
> is identical to the generic except of lack of __GFP_ACCOUNT for the user
> PTEs allocation.
>
> Switch csky to use generic
The csky implementation pte_alloc_one(), pte_free_kernel() and pte_free()
is identical to the generic except of lack of __GFP_ACCOUNT for the user
PTEs allocation.
Switch csky to use generic version of these functions.
The csky implementation of pte_alloc_one_kernel() is not replaced because
it
