I have done a very simple comparison with gdb disassemble:
By applying this patch, there was a reduction in the function size from
882 to 878 instructions.
(It's a resend, due to not having all the correct lists on my previous
mail)
On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 18:30 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Reduc
Reduces the number of calls to get_current() in order to get the value of
current->mm by doing it once and storing the value, since it is not
supposed to change inside the same process).
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras
---
Re-sending to all lists involved. (I missed kvm ones)
arch/powerpc/kvm/book
On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 15:35 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Could you please provide feedback on this patch?
I have done a very simple comparison with gcc disassemble:
By applying this patch, there was a reduction in the function size from
882 to 878 instructions.
signature.asc
Description: This i
On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 23:47 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Hello Paul,
> I sent this patch, but I have a question:
>
> > + mm = current->mm;
>
> Here, current->mm is not always the same as kvm->mm?
> Thanks
I have contacted Paul, who said it is equivalent. But I think I will
deal with that o
Hello Paul,
I sent this patch, but I have a question:
On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 19:27 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Reduces the number of calls to get_current() in order to get the value of
> current->mm by doing it once and storing the value, since it is not
> supposed to change inside the same proc
Reduces the number of calls to get_current() in order to get the value of
current->mm by doing it once and storing the value, since it is not
supposed to change inside the same process).
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 6 inse
