On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:57:02PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
[...]
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -525,8 +525,6 @@ else
KBUILD_CFLAGS+= -O2
endif
-include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
-
ifneq (CONFIG_FRAME_WARN,0)
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:20:01PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:57:02PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
[...]
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -525,8 +525,6 @@ else
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2
endif
-include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:20:01PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
[...]
But then, this commit reverted things back (w/o your Ack):
commit bef5b54bd7bf8117c75cb943d64549134c6d9a1f
Author: Ralf Baechle r...@linux-mips.org
Date: Wed Jul 16 13:02:24 2008 +0100
Fix MIPS cross-compile
* Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:20:01PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
[...]
But then, this commit reverted things back (w/o your Ack):
commit bef5b54bd7bf8117c75cb943d64549134c6d9a1f
Author: Ralf Baechle r...@linux-mips.org
Date: Wed
There are few arches that have auto detection of CROSS_COMPILE
variable: mips, m68k, parisc, xtensa, h8300 and blackfin.
So `normal' arches don't have any chance to overwrite the flags
because of the few offenders above. ;-)
We also have archs where we add options to gcc that may
impact
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 23:03 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
So the question is: even with FRAME_POINTERS disabled on PPC, is
__builtin_return_address(1)/(2) reliable, and is save_stack_trace() fast?
(i.e.
can it walk down the stack
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:26:12PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote:
This patch gives arches more freedom on overwriting CFLAGS, specifically
on PowerPC we want to remove -fno-omit-frame-pointer flag.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:51:34PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 22:26 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
+include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
+
# arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is
included
NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc
* Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:26:12PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote:
This patch gives arches more freedom on overwriting CFLAGS, specifically
on PowerPC we want to remove -fno-omit-frame-pointer
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 23:03 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
So the question is: even with FRAME_POINTERS disabled on PPC, is
__builtin_return_address(1)/(2) reliable, and is save_stack_trace() fast?
(i.e.
can it walk down the stack frame efficiently, or does it have to scan the full
kernel
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:23 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 22:26 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
+include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
+
# arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 22:26 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
+include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
+
# arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is
included
NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc -isystem $(shell $(CC)
-print-file-name=include)
CHECKFLAGS +=
This patch gives arches more freedom on overwriting CFLAGS, specifically
on PowerPC we want to remove -fno-omit-frame-pointer flag.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com
---
Makefile |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
13 matches
Mail list logo
