> On 18-Sep-2023, at 7:42 PM, Reza Arbab wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:02:04PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> Add a function dt_find_by_name_before_addr() that returns the child node if
>> it matches till first occurrence at "@" of a given name, otherwise NULL.
>> This is helpful for
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:02:04PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
Add a function dt_find_by_name_before_addr() that returns the child node if
it matches till first occurrence at "@" of a given name, otherwise NULL.
This is helpful for cases with node name like: "name@addr". In
scenarios where nodes
> On 15-Sep-2023, at 8:00 PM, Reza Arbab wrote:
>
> Hi Athira,
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:02:04PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> +struct dt_node *dt_find_by_name_before_addr(struct dt_node *root, const
>> char *name)
>> +{
>> + struct dt_node *child, *match;
>> + char *child_node =
Hi Athira,
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:02:04PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
+struct dt_node *dt_find_by_name_before_addr(struct dt_node *root, const char
*name)
+{
+ struct dt_node *child, *match;
+ char *child_node = NULL;
+
+ list_for_each(>children, child, list) {
+
Add a function dt_find_by_name_before_addr() that returns the child node if
it matches till first occurrence at "@" of a given name, otherwise NULL.
This is helpful for cases with node name like: "name@addr". In
scenarios where nodes are added with "name@addr" format and if the
value of "addr" is
