Hi Masahiro,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 08:21:01AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> V2 is good except one nit.
> (I left a comment in it)
Thanks, and yes I agree with your comment that the GCC<4.6 __diag()
definition can be removed.
> I can fix it up locally if it is tedious to re-spin, though.
If
2018-06-20 4:02 GMT+09:00 Paul Burton :
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:34:35AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2018-06-16 9:53 GMT+09:00 Paul Burton :
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
>> > index f1a7492a5cc8..aba64a2912d8 100644
>> > ---
Hi Masahiro,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:34:35AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2018-06-16 9:53 GMT+09:00 Paul Burton :
> > diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> > index f1a7492a5cc8..aba64a2912d8 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> > +++
Hi.
2018-06-16 9:53 GMT+09:00 Paul Burton :
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> I have occasionally run into a situation where it would make sense to
> control a compiler warning from a source file rather than doing so from
> a Makefile using the $(cc-disable-warning, ...) or $(cc-option, ...)
> helpers.
Le 16/06/2018 à 02:53, Paul Burton a écrit :
From: Arnd Bergmann
I have occasionally run into a situation where it would make sense to
control a compiler warning from a source file rather than doing so from
a Makefile using the $(cc-disable-warning, ...) or $(cc-option, ...)
helpers.
The
From: Arnd Bergmann
I have occasionally run into a situation where it would make sense to
control a compiler warning from a source file rather than doing so from
a Makefile using the $(cc-disable-warning, ...) or $(cc-option, ...)
helpers.
The approach here is similar to what glibc uses, using
