On 12/14/18 1:56 PM, Michael Bringmann wrote:
> On 12/14/2018 11:20 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Frank Rowand
>>>
>>> Non-overlay dynamic devicetree node removal may leave the node in
>>> the phandle cache. Subsequent calls to
On 12/14/2018 11:20 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM wrote:
>>
>> From: Frank Rowand
>>
>> Non-overlay dynamic devicetree node removal may leave the node in
>> the phandle cache. Subsequent calls to of_find_node_by_phandle()
>> will incorrectly find the stale entry.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM wrote:
>
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Non-overlay dynamic devicetree node removal may leave the node in
> the phandle cache. Subsequent calls to of_find_node_by_phandle()
> will incorrectly find the stale entry. Remove the node from the
> cache.
>
> Add paranoia
From: Frank Rowand
Non-overlay dynamic devicetree node removal may leave the node in
the phandle cache. Subsequent calls to of_find_node_by_phandle()
will incorrectly find the stale entry. Remove the node from the
cache.
Add paranoia checks in of_find_node_by_phandle() as a second level
of
