Hi Borislav,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 8:34 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 03:36:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > x86 maintainers,
> >
> > Ping.
>
> You got the required ACKs. If you want me to carry this one and the
> UML one through the tip tree, lemme know. Or you
On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 03:36:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> x86 maintainers,
>
> Ping.
You got the required ACKs. If you want me to carry this one and the
UML one through the tip tree, lemme know. Or you can do what Richard
suggested. Your call.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good
x86 maintainers,
Ping.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 8:23 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Masahiro Yamada writes:
>
> > GCC 4.6 manual says:
> >
> > -funit-at-a-time
> > This option is left for compatibility reasons. -funit-at-a-time has
> > no effect, while -fno-unit-at-a-time implies
Masahiro Yamada writes:
> GCC 4.6 manual says:
>
> -funit-at-a-time
> This option is left for compatibility reasons. -funit-at-a-time has
> no effect, while -fno-unit-at-a-time implies -fno-toplevel-reorder
> and -fno-section-anchors.
> Enabled by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro
* Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> GCC 4.6 manual says:
>
> -funit-at-a-time
> This option is left for compatibility reasons. -funit-at-a-time has
> no effect, while -fno-unit-at-a-time implies -fno-toplevel-reorder
> and -fno-section-anchors.
> Enabled by default.
>
> Signed-off-by:
GCC 4.6 manual says:
-funit-at-a-time
This option is left for compatibility reasons. -funit-at-a-time has
no effect, while -fno-unit-at-a-time implies -fno-toplevel-reorder
and -fno-section-anchors.
Enabled by default.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
arch/powerpc/Makefile | 4
