[Adding Tony Prisk to Cc]
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:31:30AM +, Alistair Popple wrote:
Currently the ppc-of driver uses the compatibility string
usb-ehci. This means platforms that use device-tree and implement an
EHCI compatible interface have to either use the ppc-of driver or add
a
On Friday 21 February 2014 11:48:03 Mark Rutland wrote:
+
+ np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, ibm,usb-ohci-440epx);
+ if (np != NULL) {
+ /* claim we really affected by usb23 erratum */
+ if (!of_address_to_resource(np, 0, res))
+
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Alistair Popple wrote:
Currently the ppc-of driver uses the compatibility string
usb-ehci. This means platforms that use device-tree and implement an
EHCI compatible interface have to either use the ppc-of driver or add
a compatible line to the ehci-platform driver. It
On 22/02/14 00:48, Mark Rutland wrote:
[Adding Tony Prisk to Cc]
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:31:30AM +, Alistair Popple wrote:
Currently the ppc-of driver uses the compatibility string
usb-ehci. This means platforms that use device-tree and implement an
EHCI compatible interface have to
Currently the ppc-of driver uses the compatibility string
usb-ehci. This means platforms that use device-tree and implement an
EHCI compatible interface have to either use the ppc-of driver or add
a compatible line to the ehci-platform driver. It would be more
appropriate for the platform driver
