On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 02:07:04PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> We could add 'depends on HAVE_PCI' or something
> to guard it to avoid changing the logic.
I guess that makes sense.
> config PCI_ENDPOINT
> bool "PCI Endpoint Support"
> depends on HAVE_PCI # Is this correct
Hi Christoph,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 1:03 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/xtensa/configs/iss_defconfig
> b/arch/xtensa/configs/iss_defconfig
> index 4bb5b76d9524..818849bb7736 100644
> --- a/arch/xtensa/configs/iss_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/xtensa/configs/iss_defconfig
> @@ -4,7
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:04 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> There is no good reason to duplicate the PCI menu in every architecture.
> Instead provide a selectable HAS_PCI symbol that indicates availability
HAS_PCI -> HAVE_PCI
> of PCI support and the handle the rest in drivers/pci.
>
> Note
There is no good reason to duplicate the PCI menu in every architecture.
Instead provide a selectable HAS_PCI symbol that indicates availability
of PCI support and the handle the rest in drivers/pci.
Note that for powerpc we now select HAVE_PCI globally instead of the
convoluted mess of
s/^pci: /PCI: / in subject
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 05:10:12PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no good reason to duplicate the PCI menu in every architecture.
> Instead provide a selectable HAS_PCI symbol that indicates availability
> of PCI support and the handle the rest in
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:57 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 03:37:05PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > I think HAVE_ is a preferred prefix in this case according to this doc:
> >
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 03:37:05PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> I think HAVE_ is a preferred prefix in this case according to this doc:
> https://github.com/masahir0y/linux/blob/v4.19-rc4/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt#L448
Ok, I'll switch everything to HAVE_*
> If you do this for
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 12:11 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> There is no good reason to duplicate the PCI menu in every architecture.
> Instead provide a selectable HAS_PCI symbol that indicates availability
> of PCI support and the handle the rest in drivers/pci.
I think HAVE_ is a preferred
There is no good reason to duplicate the PCI menu in every architecture.
Instead provide a selectable HAS_PCI symbol that indicates availability
of PCI support and the handle the rest in drivers/pci.
Note that for powerpc we now select HAS_PCI globally instead of the
convoluted mess of
