On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 8:13 PM Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Christoph Hellwig writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:20:11AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> > I'd rather keep it out of this series and to
> >> > an interested party. Then again x32 doesn't seem to have a whole lot
> >> > of
Christoph Hellwig writes:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:20:11AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > I'd rather keep it out of this series and to
>> > an interested party. Then again x32 doesn't seem to have a whole lot
>> > of interested parties..
>>
>> Fine with me. It's on my mental list of
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:20:11AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I'd rather keep it out of this series and to
> > an interested party. Then again x32 doesn't seem to have a whole lot
> > of interested parties..
>
> Fine with me. It's on my mental list of things that we want to kill off
>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 9:45 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:15:09PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I don't think you are changing the behavior here, but I still wonder if it
> > is in fact correct for x32: is in_x32_syscall() true here when dumping an
> > x32 compat
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:15:09PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I don't think you are changing the behavior here, but I still wonder if it
> is in fact correct for x32: is in_x32_syscall() true here when dumping an
> x32 compat elf process, or should this rather be set according to which
>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 01:01:59PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > + to_compat_siginfo(csigdata, siginfo, compat_siginfo_flags()); \
> > + fill_note(note, "CORE", NT_SIGINFO, sizeof(*csigdata), csigdata); \
> > +} while (0)
>
> This doesn't build on ppc (cell_defconfig):
>
>
Christoph Hellwig writes:
> Instead of messing with the address limit just open code the trivial
> memcpy + memset logic for the native version, and a call to
> to_compat_siginfo for the compat version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> ---
> fs/binfmt_elf.c| 9 +
>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:02 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Instead of messing with the address limit just open code the trivial
> memcpy + memset logic for the native version, and a call to
> to_compat_siginfo for the compat version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Nice!
> */
>
Instead of messing with the address limit just open code the trivial
memcpy + memset logic for the native version, and a call to
to_compat_siginfo for the compat version.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
fs/binfmt_elf.c| 9 +
fs/compat_binfmt_elf.c | 6 +-
2 files
