On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 02:24:39PM +0530, Abhishek wrote:
>
>
> On 06/04/2018 05:15 PM, Akshay Adiga wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 07:04:14PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > Is this a new property ? I'm not fan of adding yet another of those
> > > silly arrays.
> > >
> > > I
On 06/04/2018 05:15 PM, Akshay Adiga wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 07:04:14PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Is this a new property ? I'm not fan of adding yet another of those
silly arrays.
I would say this is the right time now to switch over to a node per
state instead, as we
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 07:04:14PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Is this a new property ? I'm not fan of adding yet another of those
> silly arrays.
>
> I would say this is the right time now to switch over to a node per
> state instead, as we discussed with Vaidy.
I posted the node
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 13:47 +0530, Abhishek Goel wrote:
> + if (of_property_read_string_array(power_mgt,
> + "ibm,cpu-idle-state-descs", descs, dt_idle_states) < 0) {
> + of_property_read_string_array(power_mgt,
> +
Names of cpuidle states were being used for description of states
in POWER as no descriptions were added in device tree. This patch
reads description for idle states which have been added in device
tree.
The description for idle states in case of POWER can be printed
using
