Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Allow CPU0 to be nohz full

2019-04-30 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:46:40PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Peter Zijlstra's on April 25, 2019 10:04 pm: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:34:43PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > >> Since last time, I added a compile time option to opt-out of this > >> if the platform does not support suspend

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Allow CPU0 to be nohz full

2019-04-29 Thread Nicholas Piggin
Peter Zijlstra's on April 25, 2019 10:04 pm: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:34:43PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> Since last time, I added a compile time option to opt-out of this >> if the platform does not support suspend on non-zero, and tried to >> improve legibility of changelogs and explain

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Allow CPU0 to be nohz full

2019-04-25 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:34:43PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Since last time, I added a compile time option to opt-out of this > if the platform does not support suspend on non-zero, and tried to > improve legibility of changelogs and explain the justification > better. > > I have been

[PATCH v2 0/5] Allow CPU0 to be nohz full

2019-04-10 Thread Nicholas Piggin
Since last time, I added a compile time option to opt-out of this if the platform does not support suspend on non-zero, and tried to improve legibility of changelogs and explain the justification better. I have been testing this on powerpc/pseries and it seems to work fine (the firmware call to