Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] kernel/cpu.c: eliminate some indirection

2015-10-17 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On Tue, Oct 06 2015, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > v2: fix build failure on ppc, add acks. Does anyone want to take these through their tree? Rasmus ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] kernel/cpu.c: eliminate some indirection

2015-10-17 Thread Rusty Russell
Rasmus Villemoes writes: > On Tue, Oct 06 2015, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > >> v2: fix build failure on ppc, add acks. > > Does anyone want to take these through their tree? I think the x86 tree is the least illogical place, unless akpm wants it?

[PATCH v2 0/6] kernel/cpu.c: eliminate some indirection

2015-10-06 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
v2: fix build failure on ppc, add acks. The four cpumasks cpu_{possible,online,present,active}_bits are exposed readonly via the corresponding const variables cpu_xyz_mask. But they are also accessible for arbitrary writing via the exposed functions set_cpu_xyz. There's quite a bit of code