On Tue, Oct 06 2015, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> v2: fix build failure on ppc, add acks.
Does anyone want to take these through their tree?
Rasmus
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Rasmus Villemoes writes:
> On Tue, Oct 06 2015, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
>> v2: fix build failure on ppc, add acks.
>
> Does anyone want to take these through their tree?
I think the x86 tree is the least illogical place, unless akpm wants it?
v2: fix build failure on ppc, add acks.
The four cpumasks cpu_{possible,online,present,active}_bits are
exposed readonly via the corresponding const variables
cpu_xyz_mask. But they are also accessible for arbitrary writing via
the exposed functions set_cpu_xyz. There's quite a bit of code