Michael Ellerman writes:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:26:15 +1000, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
>> This function is a one line wrapper around eeh_phb_pe_create() and despite
>> the name it doesn't create any eeh_dev structures. Replace it with direct
>> calls to eeh_phb_pe_create() since that does what
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:26:15 +1000, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> This function is a one line wrapper around eeh_phb_pe_create() and despite
> the name it doesn't create any eeh_dev structures. Replace it with direct
> calls to eeh_phb_pe_create() since that does what it says on the tin
> and removes
On 22/07/2020 14:26, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> This function is a one line wrapper around eeh_phb_pe_create() and despite
> the name it doesn't create any eeh_dev structures.
The "eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic" name does not suggest anything really but
the comment does.
Reviewed-by: Alexey
This function is a one line wrapper around eeh_phb_pe_create() and despite
the name it doesn't create any eeh_dev structures. Replace it with direct
calls to eeh_phb_pe_create() since that does what it says on the tin
and removes a layer of indirection.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran
---
v2:
